2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2009.01101.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Species‐specific disturbance tolerance, competition and positive interactions along an anthropogenic disturbance gradient

Abstract: Question: As it has been found that stress promotes positive interactions mediated by physical amelioration of the environment, is it possible that interactions may turn positive with increasing chronic anthropogenic disturbance (CAD) intensity? Also, is it possible that species that do not tolerate disturbance may require environmental amelioration by their neighbours in disturbed areas, whereas tolerant species may not? Location: The semi‐arid grassland in Concepción Buenavista, Oaxaca, southern Mexico. Me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
44
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
5
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our main focus is on the role of social information and heterospecific attraction in structuring the species community. As facilitative processes are expected to dominate over competitive processes in continuously perturbed environments (Bertness & Callaway 1994;Villarreal-Barajas & Martorell 2009), we predicted the predominance of positive co-occurrence patterns in this system. However, as some of the species have very similar niches and thus are likely to show strong competitive interactions, we predicted that the co-occurrence pattern could be negative for some pairs of species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Our main focus is on the role of social information and heterospecific attraction in structuring the species community. As facilitative processes are expected to dominate over competitive processes in continuously perturbed environments (Bertness & Callaway 1994;Villarreal-Barajas & Martorell 2009), we predicted the predominance of positive co-occurrence patterns in this system. However, as some of the species have very similar niches and thus are likely to show strong competitive interactions, we predicted that the co-occurrence pattern could be negative for some pairs of species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In stressful systems that present sporadic resource pulses, stress drives plant growth over the scarcity period, while competition occurs during benign bouts (Fowler 1986;Briones et al 1998;Chesson et al 2004). In arid environments, shrub removal by CAD may increase water stress by reducing infiltration and increasing soil moisture loss (Valiente-Banuet and Ezcurra 1991; Rietkerk et al 1997;Adair et al 2008;Villarreal-Barajas and Martorell 2009). This may explain why, on most years, cactus' size became smaller in DS, where shrub cover was only 3% compared to 15% in NDS.…”
Section: Vital Rates and Population Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We recorded the number of individuals of all species in 20 randomly chosen 0.1 9 0.1 m squares in each quadrat. This sampling unit was selected because it probably reflects the scale over which interactions occur given the extremely small sizes of plants in this grassland (Freckleton & Watkinson 2001b;Villareal-Barajas & Martorell 2009). Only presence-absence was recorded for three highly clonal species (Bouteloua polymorpha and Tripogon spicatus).…”
Section: A T Amentioning
confidence: 99%