2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2003.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Species-specific immune response to immunization with human versus rodent Aβ peptide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, we studied animals of the J20 strain that were older than 11 months of age and did not observe substantial increases in Aβ deposition linked to age in the cohort we studied (Aβ deposition values as determined both by ELISA and thioflavin S staining for individual mice in each treatment group and controls are presented in Supplemental Tables 1-3; supplemental material available online with this article; doi:10.1172/JCI23241DS1). Our experience is consistent with the reports of other investigators who did not find a large increase in Aβ levels in animals between the ages of 12 and 15 months (32)(33)(34). Also, when we exactly age-matched our control group (13.3 months) with MOG-EAE animals and animals treated nasally with GA+IVX-908, we found a significant effect of treatment on Aβ levels measured by 2 methods (P < 0.001; Supplemental Table 4).…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Nonetheless, we studied animals of the J20 strain that were older than 11 months of age and did not observe substantial increases in Aβ deposition linked to age in the cohort we studied (Aβ deposition values as determined both by ELISA and thioflavin S staining for individual mice in each treatment group and controls are presented in Supplemental Tables 1-3; supplemental material available online with this article; doi:10.1172/JCI23241DS1). Our experience is consistent with the reports of other investigators who did not find a large increase in Aβ levels in animals between the ages of 12 and 15 months (32)(33)(34). Also, when we exactly age-matched our control group (13.3 months) with MOG-EAE animals and animals treated nasally with GA+IVX-908, we found a significant effect of treatment on Aβ levels measured by 2 methods (P < 0.001; Supplemental Table 4).…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 92%
“…As expected, control treated APP+PS1 mice as well as mice receiving only NCX-2216 demonstrated no anti-Aβ antibody titers. These titers (approximately 8 μg/ml) are low compared to results reported by others after inoculations in active immunization protocols (Seabrook et al, 2004;Das et al, 2003). This may reflect the advanced age of the mice at sacrifice (20 mo), the variations between laboratories in the ELISA protocol used to measure the antibody titers or the 2 month interval from the last inoculation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…This difference was best discerned when low titers of the antimouse IgG-HRP were used. Seabrook et al (2004) also reported immunohistochemical labeling of amyloid deposits for mouse IgG after passive immunization but detected signals in both immunized and nonimmunized mice. It is unclear whether lower anti-mouse IgG concentrations might have revealed selective staining in anti-A␤-treated animals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%