2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Species specific in vitro protein digestion (pH-stat) for fish: method development and application for juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), cobia (Rachycentron canadum), and Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
39
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
39
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the structures and inner pH values of gastrointestinal tracts of these fish species are largely different. For example, common carp has no stomach and the intestinal pH value is 6.8–7.3 (Ji ), whereas the fish species having stomach, such as channel catfish, rainbow trout and tilapia, have lower pH values in stomach (Robinson & Wilson ; Yasumaru & Lemos ). Moreover, the properties and chemical composition of diets, optimum living temperature and digestive efficiency are also different among fish species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the structures and inner pH values of gastrointestinal tracts of these fish species are largely different. For example, common carp has no stomach and the intestinal pH value is 6.8–7.3 (Ji ), whereas the fish species having stomach, such as channel catfish, rainbow trout and tilapia, have lower pH values in stomach (Robinson & Wilson ; Yasumaru & Lemos ). Moreover, the properties and chemical composition of diets, optimum living temperature and digestive efficiency are also different among fish species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It provides multiple advantages such as specific response using standardized enzymes, stable conditions, rapid, precise, test of small amounts of different ingredients and suitability for different sources of ingredients, including marine‐based animal and plant ingredients (Lemos, Lawrence, & Siccardi, ; Yasumaru & Lemos, ). There is currently great interest in efforts to standardize the pH‐Stat method in fish species (Dimes & Haard, ; El‐Mowafi, Dorrell, & Bureau, ; Tibbetts, Milley, Ross, Verreth, & Lall, ; Tibbetts, Verreth, & Lall, ; Yasumaru & Lemos, ) and crustaceans (Ezquerra, Garcia‐Carreño, Civera, & Haard, ; Lemos, Ezquerra, & García‐Carreño, ; Lemos et al., ). This is because the main limitation in pH‐Stat assays seems to be an incomplete understanding of assay results in relation to the activities and origin of various enzymes, given that variation in species, fish size/age and phenotype could generate poor reproducibility of the in vitro digestion assays (Tibbetts, Milley et al., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the use of enzymatic cocktails from fish makes the methods more expensive and less reproducible (Gomes et al., ), since enzyme activity can change with fish age, sexual maturation, specie and procedures using these cocktails need standardization (Dimes & Haard, ). Although, Yasumaru and Lemos () standardized the hydrolytic capacity of the species‐specific enzyme extracts on purified protein substrates, most of the studies using fish enzymes did not. Another point with in vitro methods used for assess protein digestibility as pH‐stat or drop methods is the use of alkaline pH (>8.0), without gastric phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%