2015
DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0792
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Species with more volatile population dynamics are differentially impacted by weather

Abstract: Climatic variation has been invoked as an explanation of population dynamics for a variety of taxa. Much work investigating the link between climatic forcings and population fluctuation uses single-taxon case studies. Here, we conduct comparative analyses of a multi-decadal dataset describing population dynamics of 50 co-occurring butterfly species at 10 sites in Northern California. Specifically, we explore the potential commonality of response to weather among species that encompass a gradient of population … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…And, to what extent can fluctuations in observed monarchs per year at focal sites be predicted by local and regional weather variables, both at the summer sites and at the overwintering grounds? With respect to these questions, we predict monarch numbers to be declining, as previous studies have shown negative trends over time for most butterflies in the region, especially at low-elevation sites (Forister et al 2011;Harrison et al 2015). We also hypothesize that warming conditions will have had a negative influence on the population, as has been observed for other butterflies in northern California (Casner et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…And, to what extent can fluctuations in observed monarchs per year at focal sites be predicted by local and regional weather variables, both at the summer sites and at the overwintering grounds? With respect to these questions, we predict monarch numbers to be declining, as previous studies have shown negative trends over time for most butterflies in the region, especially at low-elevation sites (Forister et al 2011;Harrison et al 2015). We also hypothesize that warming conditions will have had a negative influence on the population, as has been observed for other butterflies in northern California (Casner et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…This analytical method is described in detail elsewhere (see Nice et al 2014;Harrison et al 2015). Briefly, the model estimates posterior probability distributions (PPDs) for partial regression coefficients associated with model terms at multiple hierarchical levels, in this case site and transect wide.…”
Section: Hierarchical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to investigate species-specific sensitivities to neonicotinoids, we used a hierarchical Bayesian binomial regression that estimates population-level beta coefficients, as described in detail elsewhere [13,14]. The model included annual neonicotinoid totals (kilograms) for each county, as well as year, with the response variable being the number of days butterflies were observed (for each species) out of the total number of days that each site was visited.…”
Section: (C) Species-specific Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous analyses of abiotic effects have noted responses to weather that were heterogeneous and idiosyncratic among sites and species [16,17]. For example, associations with climatic variables often differ in sign among congeneric species [18], and even among populations of a single species [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%