“…Further investigation of this incongruity resulted in the recognition of canine staphylococcal strain 887, representative of the cultures in question, which was determined to share antigenic components with strain 61218, as well as with strain 17. However, after treatment of antiserum 17 with strain 887, subsequent to its absorption with strain 61218 (the procedure used until then [8] for the preparation of absorbed antiserum 17), the new diagnostic serum 17 was found to have retained its specificity for staphylococci of human origin, while it ceased to agglutinate any of the isolates involved. These then reacted only with absorbed antiserum 61218 and thus proved to be staphylococci of canine biotype.…”