2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2018.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specific aspects of cognitive impulsivity are longitudinally associated with lower treatment retention and greater relapse in therapeutic community treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These neurocognitive deficits may influence the patients' ability to attend and retain new information, identify goals or flexibly adapt to new environmental demands (Rupp, 2012). Moreover, cognitive deficits can be associated with increased impulsivity (Bates et al, 2002;Czapla et al, 2016;Moraleda Barreno et al, 2019) that alter decision making (Domínguez-Salas, Díaz-Batanero, Lozano-Rojas, & Verdejo-García, 2016; Moraleda Barreno et al, 2019;Stevens et al, 2015). As a consequence, patients with alcohol-related cognitive impairment (ARCI) present lower self-efficacy (Bates, Pawlak, Tonigan, & Buckman, 2006;Sachdeva et al, 2016), lower motivation and treatment compliance (Bates et al, 2013(Bates et al, , 2006Bernardin et al, 2014), as well as fewer days of abstinence (Florez et al, 2019;Sachdeva et al, 2016), more drinks per drinking day (US SDUs, 1SDU = 14 g) (Bates et al, 2006) and poorer quality of life (Horton, Duffy, & Martin, 2015;Rensen, Egger, Westhoff, Walvoort, & Kessels, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These neurocognitive deficits may influence the patients' ability to attend and retain new information, identify goals or flexibly adapt to new environmental demands (Rupp, 2012). Moreover, cognitive deficits can be associated with increased impulsivity (Bates et al, 2002;Czapla et al, 2016;Moraleda Barreno et al, 2019) that alter decision making (Domínguez-Salas, Díaz-Batanero, Lozano-Rojas, & Verdejo-García, 2016; Moraleda Barreno et al, 2019;Stevens et al, 2015). As a consequence, patients with alcohol-related cognitive impairment (ARCI) present lower self-efficacy (Bates, Pawlak, Tonigan, & Buckman, 2006;Sachdeva et al, 2016), lower motivation and treatment compliance (Bates et al, 2013(Bates et al, , 2006Bernardin et al, 2014), as well as fewer days of abstinence (Florez et al, 2019;Sachdeva et al, 2016), more drinks per drinking day (US SDUs, 1SDU = 14 g) (Bates et al, 2006) and poorer quality of life (Horton, Duffy, & Martin, 2015;Rensen, Egger, Westhoff, Walvoort, & Kessels, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emerging research has revealed that executive functions, such as inhibitory control, working memory and decision-making, are significantly associated with MUD treatment outcomes 8,9 . Specifically, consumers with deficits in executive functions are at greater risk of dropping out of treatment, relapsing after abstinence-oriented treatment, and struggling to regain quality of life 10,11 . This research, together with recent evidence showing that current treatment interventions for MUD have overall limited efficacy 4 , raises the need to incorporate cognitive remediation interventions for executive dysfunction as an add-on to current treatment approaches 12,13 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Response inhibition is more reliably impaired than attentional inhibition in those with alcohol use disorder (Wilcox et al 2014). Additionally, it has been shown that response inhibition ability, but not attentional inhibition ability, predicted relapse and drop-out from treatment in patients with alcohol use disorder (Rupp et al 2016;Tilden et al 2018;Barreno et al 2019;van Emmerik-van Oortmerssen et al 2020). Other studies demonstrated that not only relapse, but also treatment response could be predicted using response inhibition ability (Czapla et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%