2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2015.08.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specific distribution of non-phosphorylated neurofilaments characterizing each subfield in the mouse auditory cortex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1a ). Delineation of this functional map is consistent with differences in molecular distribution 5 6 and projections from the auditory thalamus, the medial geniculate body (MGB) 5 7 8 .…”
supporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1a ). Delineation of this functional map is consistent with differences in molecular distribution 5 6 and projections from the auditory thalamus, the medial geniculate body (MGB) 5 7 8 .…”
supporting
confidence: 59%
“…The rostrocaudal distance from the bregma was determined, comparing the coronal view of the Nissl-stained slice with the corresponding slice in the Paxinos and Franklin atlas 19 . This method provides reliable standard values for the distance from the bregma in C57BL/6 mice 6 20 31 32 . We evaluated the dorsoventral level of the injection site by measuring the distance between the dorsal edge of the rhinal fissure and the line penetrating the center of the injection site on the images rotated clockwise by 15° ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In six cases, the sections were also processed for parvalbumin (PV) or SMI32 fluorescent immunostaining (Figure 1, B and F). Previous studies reported that PV and SMI32 immunoreactivity in the AC delineate lemniscal auditory areas (primary auditory cortex A1 and anterior auditory field AAF (Cruikshank, Killackey et al 2001, Horie, Tsukano et al 2015)). However, no studies described the distribution of layer 5 and 6 corticocollicular neurons with respect to these neurohistological markers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In contrast, our data showed a neurometabolic decoupling above 29°C in brain slice. While FAD signals were used to track the neuronal activity in vivo , where the core body temperature of the subject was kept at 37–37.5°C [33,35], our study showed an inability to detect FAD signals at 37°C. Given that the neurometabolic coupling at 25°C was associated with the maximum oxidative capacity and the maximum metabolic change evoked by the neuronal activity, 37°C, the optimal temperature in vivo could possibly be shifted to lower temperature in vitro .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%