2020
DOI: 10.1177/1525740120976109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specific EF-Related Tasks and Reading in Adolescents With Typical Hearing or a Cochlear Implant

Abstract: The acquisition of effective reading comprehension for adolescents with cochlear implant (CI) in inclusive settings is crucial for ensuring the benefit of current traditional reading curricula and instructional practices. Executive functions (EF) are recognized as important cognitive processes during reading by students with typical hearing (TH). This study compared the relationship between EF and reading comprehension in adolescents with TH and CI. Three tests sessions were performed on two groups of adolesce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 45 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are some inconsistencies reported across these studies potentially because of different methods of assessing EF and language or because studies conflated both behavioural regulation and meta-cognition EF tasks. For example, Figueroa et al (2022) found no significant differences between a deaf group with cochlear implant and a hearing control group on experimental EF tasks, while other authors found difficulties with meta-cognition and behavioural regulation skills (Kronenberger et al, 2020). A small number of studies comparing deaf children with deaf parents (native signers) finds comparable performance on EF measures with hearing peers, strengthening the proposed link between early communication and language experience and typical development of EFs (Goodwin et al, 2022;Hall et al, 2017Hall et al, , 2018Marshall et al, 2015).…”
Section: Efs and Deafnessmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…There are some inconsistencies reported across these studies potentially because of different methods of assessing EF and language or because studies conflated both behavioural regulation and meta-cognition EF tasks. For example, Figueroa et al (2022) found no significant differences between a deaf group with cochlear implant and a hearing control group on experimental EF tasks, while other authors found difficulties with meta-cognition and behavioural regulation skills (Kronenberger et al, 2020). A small number of studies comparing deaf children with deaf parents (native signers) finds comparable performance on EF measures with hearing peers, strengthening the proposed link between early communication and language experience and typical development of EFs (Goodwin et al, 2022;Hall et al, 2017Hall et al, , 2018Marshall et al, 2015).…”
Section: Efs and Deafnessmentioning
confidence: 95%