2010
DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/22/13/136002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specific heat of Gd4Co3

Abstract: The specific heat (C(T)) of Gd₄Co₃ was measured in the temperature range 2-300 K and its magnetic contribution (C(m)(T)) was determined using a new method that fits the electronic specific heat coefficient (γ) and the Debye temperature (θ(D)) by constraining the resulting magnetic entropy (S(m)(T)) to saturate at temperatures far above the Curie temperature (T(C)). C(m)(T) exhibits a low-temperature bump originating from thermal excitation of gapped spin waves, which is responsible for pronounced peaks, at ≈35… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…31 The inset of Figure 10 presents the low-temperature (T ≪ θ D ) linear fits of C/T(T 2 ), which correspond to the fitting parameters γ A = 20(4) mJ K −2 mol(at) −1 , γ B = 9.1(2) mJ K −2 mol(at) −1 , θ DA = 239(4) K, and θ DB = 228(4) K. As can be seen in the expanded view shown in the inset of Figure 10, the C/T versus T 2 representation for the sample Gd 1.99 Co 2.58 Si 0.44 presents an upward deviation below 4 K that has not been considered in the fitting procedure. This deviation of the low-temperature linear behavior has been also found in the literature in Gd-based intermetallic compounds 32 and needs further study. The specific heat for Gd 2.00 Co 2.52 Si 0.49 (sample A) was not measured to such a low temperature, and hence this upward deviation was not observed.…”
Section: Xrd Analysissupporting
confidence: 67%
“…31 The inset of Figure 10 presents the low-temperature (T ≪ θ D ) linear fits of C/T(T 2 ), which correspond to the fitting parameters γ A = 20(4) mJ K −2 mol(at) −1 , γ B = 9.1(2) mJ K −2 mol(at) −1 , θ DA = 239(4) K, and θ DB = 228(4) K. As can be seen in the expanded view shown in the inset of Figure 10, the C/T versus T 2 representation for the sample Gd 1.99 Co 2.58 Si 0.44 presents an upward deviation below 4 K that has not been considered in the fitting procedure. This deviation of the low-temperature linear behavior has been also found in the literature in Gd-based intermetallic compounds 32 and needs further study. The specific heat for Gd 2.00 Co 2.52 Si 0.49 (sample A) was not measured to such a low temperature, and hence this upward deviation was not observed.…”
Section: Xrd Analysissupporting
confidence: 67%
“…11 This clearly indicates that the low temperature electron transport behavior of these compounds is dominated by strong magnon-induced s-d electron scattering. 11 This clearly indicates that the low temperature electron transport behavior of these compounds is dominated by strong magnon-induced s-d electron scattering.…”
Section: ð þmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Initially, we used the set of G-parameters of GdCoFe for the coupling constants [1,28]. For the specific heat capacities of lattice and electron systems, C l and C e , we used values for Mn 2 Ga single crystals [29], shown in table 1, where the heat capacity of the electron system is indicated trough γ e = C e /T e -the proportionality factor.…”
Section: Constantsmentioning
confidence: 99%