2015
DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specific olfactory neurons and glomeruli are associated to differences in behavioral responses to pheromone components between two Helicoverpa species

Abstract: Sex pheromone communication of moths helps to understand the mechanisms underlying reproductive isolation and speciation. Helicoverpa armigera and Helicoverpa assulta use (Z)-11-hexadecenal (Z11-16:Ald) and (Z)-9-hexadecenal (Z9-16:Ald) as pheromone components in reversed ratios, 97:3 and 5:95, respectively. H. armigera also produces trace amount of (Z)-9-tetradecenal (Z9-14:Ald) in the sex pheromone gland, but H. assulta does not. Wind tunnel studies revealed that the addition of small amounts (0.3%) of Z9-14… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
74
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(77 reference statements)
5
74
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The spike frequencies (spikes/s) were calculated by counting the number of spikes with the same amplitude during the first 200 ms of the response. However, we counted the total number of spikes from the C type sensilla of H. armigera because our previous cross-adaptation test indicated this type sensilla of H. armigera contain two OSNs with similar spike amplitudes which are difficult to differentiate (Wu et al, 2015). For both non-responding and poorly responding OSNs, spikes were counted during the same 200 ms post-stimulus interval.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The spike frequencies (spikes/s) were calculated by counting the number of spikes with the same amplitude during the first 200 ms of the response. However, we counted the total number of spikes from the C type sensilla of H. armigera because our previous cross-adaptation test indicated this type sensilla of H. armigera contain two OSNs with similar spike amplitudes which are difficult to differentiate (Wu et al, 2015). For both non-responding and poorly responding OSNs, spikes were counted during the same 200 ms post-stimulus interval.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One large amplitude neuron responding to Z9-16:Ald, and one with small amplitude responding to Z9-14:Ald, and have been previously identified on the basis of their different spike amplitudes (Berg and Mustaparta, 1995; Berg et al, 2005). In H. armigera , the two neurons in C type sensilla are difficult to differentiate due to their similar spike amplitudes (Wu et al, 2015; Xu et al, 2016). As in other Heliothine species (Christensen et al, 1991; Berg et al, 1998; Vickers and Christensen, 2003), the pheromonal information received by OSNs is conveyed to the MGC area of the AL (Berg et al, 2005; Zhao and Berg, 2010; Wu et al, 2013, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Presumably, void of socket would restrict the mechano-sensation (Schneider, 1964), while the long hair-shaped STs are specialized for pheromone sensory (Prestwich, Du, & LaForest, 1995;Steinbrecht, Laue, Maida, & Ziegelberger, 1996). Single sensillum recording has substantiated the pheromone sensitivity of ST on male antennae of Heliothis, Helicoverpa, and Manduca species (Baker et al, 2004;Kaissling, Hildebrand, & Tumlinson, 1989;Wu et al, 2015). Furthermore, molecular studies on other species have continually validated the abundance of pheromone-binding proteins in ST, indicating their participation in pheromone detection (Laue, Maida, & Redkozubov, 1997;Yu et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Similarly, the amygdala and striatum have been implicated in the processing of sexual stimuli (15, 16). Stronger striatal reactivity in response to sexual cues has been shown to predict subsequent sexual behavior (17) and striatal sensitivity to sexual cues has been observed in individuals with compulsive sexual behavior relative to controls (16, 18). Based on this model and the existing work on the neurobiology of sexual risk, one contributor to risky sexual behavior in MSM may be individual variability within the prefrontal cortex system, leading to individual differences in executive functioning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%