Specific or general exercise strategy for subacromial impingement syndrome–does it matter? A systematic literature review and meta analysis

Abstract

BackgroundExercise is frequently suggested as a treatment option for patients presenting with symptoms of subacromial impingement syndrome. Some would argue implementing a specific exercise strategy with special focus on correction of kinematic deficits would be superior to general exercise strategy. There is however a lack of evidence comparing such exercise strategies to determine which is the most effective in the treatment of subacromial impingement syndrome. The aim of this review is to evaluate whether implementing specific exercise strategies involving resistive exercises are more effective than a general exercise strategy for the treatment of patients with subacromial impingement syndrome.MethodsRandomized controlled trials were identified through an electronic search on PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science and PEDro. In addition, article reference lists and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched. Studies were considered eligible if they included interventions with resistive specific exercises as compared to general resistance exercise. Four reviewers assessed risk of bias and methodological quality guided by Cochrane recommendations. Results were synthesised qualitatively or quantitatively, where appropriate.ResultsSix randomized controlled trials were included with 231 participants who experienced symptoms of subacromial impingement syndrome. Four studies evaluated the effectiveness of specific scapular exercise strategy and two studies evaluated the effectiveness of specific proprioceptive strategy. Five studies were of moderate quality and one study was of low quality. No consistent statistical significant differences in outcomes between treatment groups were reported in the studies. Standardized mean difference (SMD) for pain was SMD −0.19 (95% CI −0.61, 0.22) and SMD 0.30 (95% CI −0.16, 0.76) for function.ConclusionsThere is insufficient evidence to support or refute the effectiveness of specific resistive exercise strategies in the rehabilitation of subacromial impingement syndrome. More high quality research is needed to accurately assess this. This review provides suggestions on how to improve the methodological design of future studies in this area.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12891-017-1518-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Work-related risk factors for specific shoulder disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis

“…In addition, as psychosocial factors play a more prominent role in the onset and prevalence of non-specific SP—through other biological pathways such as muscle strain from the neck and shoulder muscles—targeted interventions counteracting these factors might also be considered. There are indications that specific strength training42–44 or just general exercise training,45 adjustment to furniture and equipment46 and improving work techniques like taking more breaks and reducing work demands can reduce specific and non-specific shoulder disorders 47…”

Spa therapy together with supervised self-mobilisation improves pain, function and quality of life in patients with chronic shoulder pain: a single-blind randomised controlled trial

“…However, the self-mobilisation performed by our patients cannot be compared to conventional rehabilitation made up of 30- to 40-min sessions of exercises, two to five times a week, for 6 weeks to 5 months (Gleyze et al 2011 ). It is hard to settle the case as shoulder disorders are quite heterogeneous, the physical treatments can be different and the methodological quality of trials in the field are variable, illustrated by the discordant conclusions of reviews (Hanratty et al 2012 ; Ellenbecker and Cools 2010 ; Shire et al 2017 ). A systematic review of physical therapy trials (Page et al 2015 ) reported that most of the 171 selected trials assessed mainly pain (87%), function (72%) and range of motion (67%); adverse events, overall assessment of treatment success and health-related QOL was considered in only 18–27% of trials, and work disability and referral for surgery were determined in less than 5% of trials.…”

The role of isokinetic exercises in the rehabilitation of patients with impingement syndrome of the shoulder

“…The rehabilitation program implemented for the aims of the study was specially designed for patients presenting with subacromial-deltoid impingement syndrome, for shoulder stretching, toning, rebalancing and stabilization purposes. According to one study, the higher effectiveness of a selected type of exercises can only be demonstrated provided that sufficient evidence is available (Shire et al, 2017).…”