Fundamental Issues in Control of Carbon Gasification Reactivity 1991
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-3310-4_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specific Reactivities of Pure Carbon of Diverse Origins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sizes of the catalyst particles are comparable to the widths of the mesopores. This result is in agreement with the activation mechanism suggested by Marsh et al [140], whereby metal particles catalyze gasification in their vicinity via pitting or channeling processes, resulting in the development of mesopores and macropores. Interestingly, alongside the catalytic formation of mesopores, non-catalytic gasification occurs, leading to micropore development.…”
Section: Activated Carbons For Edlcsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The sizes of the catalyst particles are comparable to the widths of the mesopores. This result is in agreement with the activation mechanism suggested by Marsh et al [140], whereby metal particles catalyze gasification in their vicinity via pitting or channeling processes, resulting in the development of mesopores and macropores. Interestingly, alongside the catalytic formation of mesopores, non-catalytic gasification occurs, leading to micropore development.…”
Section: Activated Carbons For Edlcsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The CO 2 -reactivity reaches a maximum value (R max ) at 1000 • C at the end of the dynamic step (21-24 min), decreasing as the reaction progresses in the isothermal step at 1000 • C in the oven and tending towards stability with gasification time due to less available sites per residual mass and more resistant to the CO 2 action. Such overall behavior obeys the well-known patterns of porous coal-based materials that depend on the access of CO 2 to the internal surface area of the in situ chars and the presence of catalytic species [44,45]. Figure 7 compares the reactivity and conversion profiles of the chars, and Table S6 reflects the differences and similarities of the different blends and coke by the most relevant CO 2gasification parameters derived from the mass change during the dynamic and isothermal steps.…”
Section: Co 2 -Gasification Behavior Using Thermogravimetrysupporting
confidence: 59%
“…X-ray diffraction provides information regarding the extent of char crystallinity, in particular regarding the size of the carbon crystallites. Carbon crystal structure is known to be affected by heat treatment, with X-ray diffraction measurements showing increases in crystallite size as the heat treatment temperature of the char increases. ,, Furthermore, the proportion of char in a crystalline form has been shown to increase during isothermal reaction in oxygen . This is believed to be due to the preferential removal of the noncrystalline, more reactive components of the char matrix during reaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%