2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.therwi.2024.100091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specific setup and methodology for computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) in evaluating elasmobranch sperm

Pedro Nacib Jorge-Neto,
Fabio de Moraes Francisco,
Mario Davi Dias Carneiro
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The possibility that the tank water could play a role in freshwater stingray sperm activation, as demonstrated in marine rays [25], indicates the importance of preventing sperm contact with water during collections used for artificial insemination or cryopreservation. The sperm collection performed in this study was made with care to avoid water contact, drying the cloaca region with absorbent paper, and, at any sign of feces and urine elimination, the collection tube was moved away to avoid contact with the contaminants, as recommended by Cosson et al [34] Regarding the sperm motile assessment, the use of counting chambers (Leja) on the IVOS II CASA equipment, utilizing the specific setup for elasmobranchs developed by Jorge-Neto et al [16], proved to be very effective with high accuracy, allowing the cells free movement without external mechanical interferences that could alter motility. The use of this technique is crucial, considering that the use of cover slips that press the deposited material onto the slide by their own weight can compromise the sperm movement [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The possibility that the tank water could play a role in freshwater stingray sperm activation, as demonstrated in marine rays [25], indicates the importance of preventing sperm contact with water during collections used for artificial insemination or cryopreservation. The sperm collection performed in this study was made with care to avoid water contact, drying the cloaca region with absorbent paper, and, at any sign of feces and urine elimination, the collection tube was moved away to avoid contact with the contaminants, as recommended by Cosson et al [34] Regarding the sperm motile assessment, the use of counting chambers (Leja) on the IVOS II CASA equipment, utilizing the specific setup for elasmobranchs developed by Jorge-Neto et al [16], proved to be very effective with high accuracy, allowing the cells free movement without external mechanical interferences that could alter motility. The use of this technique is crucial, considering that the use of cover slips that press the deposited material onto the slide by their own weight can compromise the sperm movement [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples were diluted with either INRA 96 or OptiXcell at ratios of 1:100 (M3; v/v), 1:400 (F3; v/v), and 1:200 (all other males; v/v). This dilution was based on visual assessment, aiming to achieve an optimal concentration of 20 × 10 sperm/mL (~60 spermatozoa per system screen), thereby minimizing cell overlap and enhancing the accuracy of the analysis [16]. After dilution, the samples were homogenized for 5 s by vortexing, and 3 µL was placed onto a 4-chamber Leja slide (IMV Technologies, France).…”
Section: Sperm Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations