2018
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3297252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specific Tastes or Cliques of Jurors?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The criteria are aggregated into the final decision according to the voting method chosen. One of the applications of MCDM is to detect and eliminate manipulation (Kontek and Sosnowska, 2018). The final result is the arithmetic mean of the jurors' votes (i.e.…”
Section: Voting In Classical Music Competitions As An Mcdm Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The criteria are aggregated into the final decision according to the voting method chosen. One of the applications of MCDM is to detect and eliminate manipulation (Kontek and Sosnowska, 2018). The final result is the arithmetic mean of the jurors' votes (i.e.…”
Section: Voting In Classical Music Competitions As An Mcdm Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, the Manhattan distance was selected from the many metrics available. This is applied in Kontek and Sosnowska (2018). The 20% of results that are most distant from the mean are then removed, i.e.…”
Section: Voting In Classical Music Competitions As An Mcdm Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%