2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00321.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specificity and Sensitivity of Claims‐Based Algorithms for Identifying Members of Medicare+Choice Health Plans That Have Chronic Medical Conditions

Abstract: Varying claims criteria improved the performance of case-finding algorithms for six chronic conditions. Highly specific, and sometimes sensitive, algorithms for identifying members of health plans with several chronic conditions can be developed using claims data.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
151
0
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
151
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…2,[37][38][39][40][41] It is important to note that this criterion is not the same as the "gold standard" established by the American Diabetes Association and World Health Organization, which requires laboratory results and patient symptoms 42,43 that are not available in the USRDS data sets. A consistently high level of accuracy and concordance between cases that were identified by this method and the American Diabetes Association/World Health Organization criteria 38,40,41 has been established. Our definition has a sensitivity of 0.75, a specificity of 0.97, and a positive predictive value of 0.88 compared with selfreported diabetes.…”
Section: Clinical Epidemiology Wwwjasnorgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,[37][38][39][40][41] It is important to note that this criterion is not the same as the "gold standard" established by the American Diabetes Association and World Health Organization, which requires laboratory results and patient symptoms 42,43 that are not available in the USRDS data sets. A consistently high level of accuracy and concordance between cases that were identified by this method and the American Diabetes Association/World Health Organization criteria 38,40,41 has been established. Our definition has a sensitivity of 0.75, a specificity of 0.97, and a positive predictive value of 0.88 compared with selfreported diabetes.…”
Section: Clinical Epidemiology Wwwjasnorgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study (14) linked multiple administrative data sources (facility, physician claims and pharmacy).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We defined NOD from Medicare claims data according to a previously published and validated method (9,(15)(16)(17)(18)(19). This method requires at least one in-patient claim or two outpatient Medicare claims for diabetes during the first posttransplantation year to establish a diagnosis of NOD (9,(15)(16)(17)(18)(19).…”
Section: Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%