Lo CC, Wang CT, Wang XJ. Speed-accuracy tradeoff by a control signal with balanced excitation and inhibition. J Neurophysiol 114: 650-661, 2015. First published May 20, 2015 doi:10.1152/jn.00845.2013.-A hallmark of flexible behavior is the brain's ability to dynamically adjust speed and accuracy in decision-making. Recent studies suggested that such adjustments modulate not only the decision threshold, but also the rate of evidence accumulation. However, the underlying neuronallevel mechanism of the rate change remains unclear. In this work, using a spiking neural network model of perceptual decision, we demonstrate that speed and accuracy of a decision process can be effectively adjusted by manipulating a top-down control signal with balanced excitation and inhibition [balanced synaptic input (BSI)]. Our model predicts that emphasizing accuracy over speed leads to reduced rate of ramping activity and reduced baseline activity of decision neurons, which have been observed recently at the level of single neurons recorded from behaving monkeys in speed-accuracy tradeoff tasks. Moreover, we found that an increased inhibitory component of BSI skews the decision time distribution and produces a pronounced exponential tail, which is commonly observed in human studies. Our findings suggest that BSI can serve as a top-down control mechanism to rapidly and parametrically trade between speed and accuracy, and such a cognitive control signal presents both when the subjects emphasize accuracy or speed in perceptual decisions. decision making; speed-accuracy tradeoff; top-down control; balanced input THE ABILITY TO DYNAMICALLY adjust speed vs. accuracy is a salient feature of decision-making (Bogacz et al. 2010; Gold and Shadlen 2002;Heitz 2014;Wang 2008;Wickelgren 1977): if "to get it right" is the priority, we slow down to gather more information and gain a better performance. On the other hand, if time is at a premium (e.g., when detecting a predator), we make a quick judgment at the potential cost of accuracy. Speed-accuracy tradeoff (SAT) can result from a trial-by-trial learning process, which is believed to depend on synaptic plasticity and reward information in the cortex and basal ganglia (Balci et al. 2010; Gold and Shadlen 2002;Lo and Wang 2006;Wang et al. 2013). However, adjustment can often be made quickly, "on the fly," based on either task instruction, a changing environment, or a subject's own will (Edwards 1965;Forstmann et al. 2008;Luce 1986;Palmer et al. 2005;Wickelgren 1977).SAT is commonly considered in terms of adjusting a decision threshold of an integrator (Bogacz et al. 2006;Edwards 1965), such as that described by the drift diffusion model (DDM) (Luce 1986;Ratcliff 1978). In this framework, under speed emphasis the decision threshold is decreased, so it can be reached faster to trigger a response, whereas accuracy emphasis is instantiated by an increase of the decision threshold to integrate more information before a decision is made. The idea of changing decision threshold is intuitively appealin...