2001
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45484-5_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specifying and Checking Fault-Tolerant Agent-Based Protocols Using Maude

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With respect to reflection, Clavel and Meseguer have formerly given detailed proofs for increasingly general fragments of rewriting logic, namely: (1) unsorted and unconditional [10], (2) unsorted conditional [17]; and (3) many-sorted conditional [17]. This paper generalizes these previous results to the case of conditional rewrite theories whose underlying equational specifications are theories in membership equational logic [43].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…With respect to reflection, Clavel and Meseguer have formerly given detailed proofs for increasingly general fragments of rewriting logic, namely: (1) unsorted and unconditional [10], (2) unsorted conditional [17]; and (3) many-sorted conditional [17]. This paper generalizes these previous results to the case of conditional rewrite theories whose underlying equational specifications are theories in membership equational logic [43].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…= true whose depth is equal to 1 + max(depth(δ ), depth(δ )) ≤ 1 + max(depth(δ ), depth(δ )) = depth(δ), and we have (2).…”
Section: By Induction Hypothesis U Melmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…• van Baalen et al [2] have used Maude to give a formal semantics to, and to analyze, key fault-tolerant protocols in the DaAgents mobile agent system. Their analysis, which includes detailed analyses of the protocols' behavior under different fault models, has revealed mistakes and inconsistencies in the protocols' informal specifications.…”
Section: Agent and Mobile Languagesmentioning
confidence: 99%