Specifying Hybrid Models of Teachers’ Work During COVID-19

Abstract

The term “hybrid” emerged as a common descriptor of pandemic-modified schooling configurations. Yet this umbrella term insufficiently captures the variations among hybrid models, particularly as it pertains to the structure of teacher workdays and related workload demands. Drawing on qualitative research documenting K–12 U.S. teachers’ experience teaching during COVID-19, this brief introduces and explicates three terms specifying structural hybrid models—parallel, alternating, and blended—and their implications for teachers’ work. Differentiating among the models facilitates future analysis of the implications of hybrid schooling for teacher and student experience. Initial analysis indicates teachers experienced one model, blended hybrid, as more challenging than others. This teacher perception highlights the need to discern among the three hybrid models more closely when analyzing schools’ responses to the pandemic. Differentiating among hybrid models may prompt future analysis of hybrid schooling for teacher workload and student learning.

Why teachers are leaving and what we can do about it

“…Teaching under these circumstances was not easy. It was especially difficult for those who were learning new technologies (Juan-Ignacio et al, 2021; Marshall, Shannon, & Love, 2022); recreating their lessons for a virtual format (Love & Marshall, 2022); teaching students in the classroom as well as those on Zoom simultaneously (Bartlett, 2022); or doing all of the above in the same school year.…”

Understanding Teacher Burnout Following COVID-19

“…Since the spring of 2020, teachers experienced the greatest disruption to the history of United States public education due to COVID-19. Between March 2020 and the conclusion of the 2021-2022 school year, teachers in the United States and around the world were asked to teach in ways that were outside of traditional methods, learn and use new technology, and navigate multiple learning modalities (sometimes simultaneously) -all while implementing strategies to mitigate the spread of the virus (Bartlett, 2022;Marshall, 2022). All of this exacerbated teacher burnout and attrition issues, making the execution of retention strategies in a field historically labeled as "high-stress" even more complex (Diliberti et al, 2021;Marshall et al, 2022a).…”

Contested Justice: Rethinking Educational Equity Through New York City’s COVID-19 School Reopening Debates

“…However, subsequent decisions about whether and how to reopen or close classrooms in response to COVID-19 cases have been contentious and persistent ( Willyard, 2021 ). Hanging in the balance of these decisions have been important potential impacts for public health ( Rauscher & Burns, 2021 ); family and caregiver well-being ( Asbury et al, 2021 ; Davis et al, 2021 ); the work of 3.2 million teachers ( Bartlett, 2022 ); and the education of 50.7 million public school students ( National Center for Educational Statistics, 2020 ). Given deep race and class disparities in death, illness, and financial hardship that have been exacerbated under COVID-19, as well as gender disparities in caregiving roles and responsibilities, schooling during the pandemic has raised multiple equity issues ( Turner, 2020a ).…”