2000
DOI: 10.1108/13552540010337074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specifying non‐uniform cusp heights as a potential aid for adaptive slicing

Abstract: Most adaptive slicing implementations assume a maximum allowable cusp height which applies to the entire part. Practically speaking, however, most parts do not have uniform cusp height requirements. Some faces are required to be smooth while other faces are relatively unimportant. With a uniform cusp height implementation, users must specify the most stringent cusp height which applies to the entire part. However, with non-uniform cusp height specifications, it is possible that further gains in adaptive slicin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Adaptive slicing concepts have been researched to minimise the staircase effect by varying the layer thickness (Sabourin et al 1996, Tyberg and Bohn 1998, Cormier et al 2000, and direct slicing concepts have been researched to skip the STL conversion to avoid chordal error (Jamieson and Hacker 1995, Chen et al 2001, Cao and Miyamoto 2003. Although there are some weaknesses in direct slicing, it has been proved useful for RP users in terms of reduced file size and execution time, and better model accuracy.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Adaptive slicing concepts have been researched to minimise the staircase effect by varying the layer thickness (Sabourin et al 1996, Tyberg and Bohn 1998, Cormier et al 2000, and direct slicing concepts have been researched to skip the STL conversion to avoid chordal error (Jamieson and Hacker 1995, Chen et al 2001, Cao and Miyamoto 2003. Although there are some weaknesses in direct slicing, it has been proved useful for RP users in terms of reduced file size and execution time, and better model accuracy.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Ma and He [11] developed an algorithm to operate directly upon a nonuniform rational B-spline (NURBS) surface model they use this algorithm for accurate and smooth part surface while selective hatching strategy use for reducing the build time. Cormier et al [12] presented an interactive procedure for gathering cusp height requirement for the different faces of the part. They determined the various surface roughness requirements and achieved efficiency gain in adaptive slicing.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between the maximum allowable cusp height and normal vector at any point on the tessellated model can be used to find the thickness of each layer. Many other researchers (Cormier et al, 2000;Jung and Ahluwalia, 2005;Pande and Kumar, 2008;Xu et al, 1997) used cusp height as an error measurement in their own algorithms. Measurement of all points on the top or bottom slice of a layer allows for calculation of the maximum allowable cusp height, leading to the division of the current thickness into small slices or keeping it at maximum thickness.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%