2007
DOI: 10.1016/s1015-9584(08)60020-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specimen Shrinkage and Its Influence on Margin Assessment in Breast Cancer

Abstract: Breast specimens undergo shrinkage after histological fixation, losing more than a third of their original closest free margin, whilst the tumour itself does not shrink substantially. This phenomenon has vital implications in the accuracy of margin analysis and consequent decisions on further management, including re-operation and the institution of adjuvant radiotherapy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
59
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
59
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Docquier PL et.al. (21) and Yaep BH et al (22) suggested that breast specimens undergo shrinkage after histological fixation, losing more than a third of their original closest free margin, whilst the tumour itself does not shrink substantially.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Docquier PL et.al. (21) and Yaep BH et al (22) suggested that breast specimens undergo shrinkage after histological fixation, losing more than a third of their original closest free margin, whilst the tumour itself does not shrink substantially.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The practical importance of this is that it may be possible to achieve a more accurate pre-operative sizing, allowing a one stage surgical procedure. Currently about 20% [19] of patients diagnosed on the NHSBSP who undergo a treatment operation require a second procedure, some of which are to remove margins involved by tumour not removed in the primary operation. This percentage could be reduced with more accurate pre-operative estimation of tumour size and shape.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it is well recognised that the processing of histological samples causes shrinkage. The literature gives wide variability in the degree of shrinkage of both the tumour and the specimen margin [19]. The measurements taken from the pathology slides that were used as our gold standard were calculated to take an overall 10% shrinkage into account.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors cautioned on the sole reliance on microscopic measurements. In a further study, Yeap and colleagues 84 quantified the shrinkage of breast specimens as a result of formalin fixation. Fifty consecutive mastectomy and wide excision specimens were prospectively appraised, and the closest free margins and maximum tumour diameters of fresh, unprepared specimens were recorded.…”
Section: Limitations Of Reference Standard For Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%