1999
DOI: 10.3757/jser.58.40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SPECT in cases of equilibrium disorders compared.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in the case of amorphous Si oxide, an insulator with a bulk band gap of about 9 eV, the long-range disordered Si-O networks suppress the fine structures to be displayed, which is reflected in normalized dI/dV curves as a featureless flat region in the energy gap, except that the peaks appear near the CBM and VBM, due to the dramatically increased LDOS there. From the sharp increased peaks on both polarity sides, we can estimate the band gap of the oxide to be about 8.9 eV, which is in good agreement with the reported value for bulk SiO 2 and the value for the ultrathin Si oxide with a similar thickness reported by other authors [14].…”
Section: Sts On Clean Si(1 1 1) and Ultrathin Si Oxidesupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, in the case of amorphous Si oxide, an insulator with a bulk band gap of about 9 eV, the long-range disordered Si-O networks suppress the fine structures to be displayed, which is reflected in normalized dI/dV curves as a featureless flat region in the energy gap, except that the peaks appear near the CBM and VBM, due to the dramatically increased LDOS there. From the sharp increased peaks on both polarity sides, we can estimate the band gap of the oxide to be about 8.9 eV, which is in good agreement with the reported value for bulk SiO 2 and the value for the ultrathin Si oxide with a similar thickness reported by other authors [14].…”
Section: Sts On Clean Si(1 1 1) and Ultrathin Si Oxidesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The depth measured by STM is about 0.3 nm, as shown in figure 1(c), corresponding to a single biatomic step on Si(1 1 1). Though the tunnelling barrier varies between Si and SiO 2 , we verify this value separately by contact-atomic force microscope(c-AFM), which is in agreement with the reported observation [14]. Since a large strain exists at the interface between Si oxide and Si, a compressive stress in the interfacial ultrathin Si oxide tends to maintain the monolayer thickness similar to that of the Si substrate, ∼0.3 nm.…”
Section: Stm Observation Of Surface Morphologysupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation