2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.10.366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectral characteristics of surface-layer turbulence in the North Sea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The assumption of stationary flow is assessed using a two-step process: firstly, the slope of the linear trend of each time series is investigated, and if the difference between the two extrema of this trend and its mean value is larger than 20%, the sample is not considered as stationary. In Cheynet et al (2017), turbulent characteristics were studied after the removal of any slightly non-linear trends using the empirical modal decomposition technique (Huang et al 1998;Chen et al 2007), but is not applied here, as we study the unaltered velocity spectra at frequencies below 1 mHz. Secondly, the stationarity of each linearly detrended time series is assessed using the so-called reverse arrangement test from Bendat and Piersol Table 1: Data availability and the effects of initial data selection processing.…”
Section: The Fino1 Platformmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The assumption of stationary flow is assessed using a two-step process: firstly, the slope of the linear trend of each time series is investigated, and if the difference between the two extrema of this trend and its mean value is larger than 20%, the sample is not considered as stationary. In Cheynet et al (2017), turbulent characteristics were studied after the removal of any slightly non-linear trends using the empirical modal decomposition technique (Huang et al 1998;Chen et al 2007), but is not applied here, as we study the unaltered velocity spectra at frequencies below 1 mHz. Secondly, the stationarity of each linearly detrended time series is assessed using the so-called reverse arrangement test from Bendat and Piersol Table 1: Data availability and the effects of initial data selection processing.…”
Section: The Fino1 Platformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) to investigate the limits of current spectral models used for wind-load estimation on offshore structures, and (2) to present the analysis of turbulence characteristics for the further development of a commonly accepted, atmospheric boundary-layer theory. Velocity data from the FINO1 platform have been used in the past to assess the applicability of the gradient Richardson number in an offshore environment (Argyle and Watson 2014), to study velocity profiles above the sea (Kettle 2013), to investigate the turbulence intensity (Türk and Emeis 2010), and to test the validity of the one-point spectral models provided in the IEC 61400-1 standard (Cheynet et al 2017). However, to the authors' knowledge, no description of the one-and two-point spectra of offshore turbulence as a function of atmospheric stability is available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Above the surface layer, the proposed model is not valid, which leads to biased estimations [43]. Worse results were attained when considering alternative values for Charnock's parameter, α c , which is a site-dependent parameter here assumed as α c = 0.012 based on previous studies [33,44,65,66] When comparing û * against mast-derived u * 1−D (Figure 10b), a much better agreement is found. This is supported by a LR as good as û * = 0.965 • u * 1−D + 0.022, which is virtually the ideal 1:1 line; ρ 2 = 0.956; and RMSE = 0.031 m/s.…”
Section: Performance Statistics: Friction Velocity and Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The limitations of current guidelines for offshore turbulence modelling, such as IEC 61400-1 ( 2005), have been highlighted in the past (Cheynet et al, 2017(Cheynet et al, , 2018. Site-specific measurements advised by IEC 61400-1 ( 2005) are justified for the mean flow and integral turbulence characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%