2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00020-015-2247-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectral Enclosure and Superconvergence for Eigenvalues in Gaps

Abstract: We consider the problem of how to compute eigenvalues of a selfadjoint operator when a direct application of the Galerkin (finite-section) method is unreliable. The last two decades have seen the development of the so-called quadratic methods for addressing this problem. Recently a new perturbation approach has emerged, the idea being to perturb eigenvalues off the real line and, consequently, away from regions where the Galerkin method fails. We propose a simplified perturbation method which requires noá prio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With additional assumptions on the operators s n , for instance that they are projection operators, we prove new types of non-convex enclosures for σ e ((T n )) and conclude for these cases that (T n ) is spectrally exact for T in an open neighbourhood of any eigenvalue of T . The paper [22] gives a similar spectral exactness conclusion for the case that (s n ) are projection operators. However, as well as including different classes of perturbations (s n ), both the statement and the proof of our results in Section 2 are far simpler than those of [22], owing to the use of the limiting essential spectrum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With additional assumptions on the operators s n , for instance that they are projection operators, we prove new types of non-convex enclosures for σ e ((T n )) and conclude for these cases that (T n ) is spectrally exact for T in an open neighbourhood of any eigenvalue of T . The paper [22] gives a similar spectral exactness conclusion for the case that (s n ) are projection operators. However, as well as including different classes of perturbations (s n ), both the statement and the proof of our results in Section 2 are far simpler than those of [22], owing to the use of the limiting essential spectrum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The paper [22] gives a similar spectral exactness conclusion for the case that (s n ) are projection operators. However, as well as including different classes of perturbations (s n ), both the statement and the proof of our results in Section 2 are far simpler than those of [22], owing to the use of the limiting essential spectrum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Such spectral exactness results are currently limited. We mention, however, the results [28, Theorem 10] and [21,Theorem 4.6] regarding spectral inclusion for isolated eigenvalues and the spectral enclosure result [21,Theorem 3.3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%