2014
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2014.980922
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectral matching approaches in hyperspectral image processing

Abstract: Many spectral matching algorithms, ranging from the traditional clustering techniques to the recent automated matching models, have evolved. This paper provides a review and up-to-date information on the past and current role of the spectral matching approaches adopted in hyperspectral satellite image processing. The need for spectral matching has been deliberated and a list of spectral matching algorithms has been compared and described. A review of the conventional spectral angle measures and the advanced au… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The spectral similarity value (SSV, SSV ∈ [0, √ 2]) evaluates the similarity of both the brightness and spectral behaviour of the retrieved hyperspectral reflectance with standard and observed aerosol (Shanmugam and SrinivasaPerumal, 2014;Granahan and Sweet, 2001). Figure 8 shows the NRMSE and SSV vs. the τ 550 for the three ROIs, where the water-leaving reflectance accuracy decreases with growing aerosol loading, particularly when an unsuitable aerosol type is selected.…”
Section: Ed(λmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The spectral similarity value (SSV, SSV ∈ [0, √ 2]) evaluates the similarity of both the brightness and spectral behaviour of the retrieved hyperspectral reflectance with standard and observed aerosol (Shanmugam and SrinivasaPerumal, 2014;Granahan and Sweet, 2001). Figure 8 shows the NRMSE and SSV vs. the τ 550 for the three ROIs, where the water-leaving reflectance accuracy decreases with growing aerosol loading, particularly when an unsuitable aerosol type is selected.…”
Section: Ed(λmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The metric for the accuracy assessment is based on the euclidean distance (ED), which is sensitive to the magnitude of the water-leaving reflectance (Shanmugam and SrinivasaPerumal, 2014) for each HICO ™ channel with central wavelength λ i .…”
Section: Standard Aerosol Types In Hico@crimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different absorption feature mapping/matching techniques have been used by the remote sensing community since hyperspectral data were made available. Among these the spectral feature fitting [73] or its improved version-multi-range spectral feature fitting (MRSFF)-are frequently used [74,75]. From the recently developed toolboxes integrating absorption feature matching techniques the Tetracoder [76] or EnGeoMAP 2.0 toolbox [77] should be listed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One consists of original similarity indices such as spectral angle mapper (SAM), the spectral correlation angle (SCA), spectral information divergence (SID), and the Jeffries-Matusita (JM) distance; the other is a similarity index, which is defined by combining original single methods. They are effective in discriminating between spectral differences by overcoming the limitations of the original indices [28,29]. This study compared the various hybrid spectral similarity indices, e.g., SIDSAM (a combination of SID with SAM), SIDSCA (a combination of SID with SCA), and JMSAM (a combination of JM with SAM).…”
Section: Generating Label Datamentioning
confidence: 99%