2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.csr.2021.104357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectral modes of radiometric measurements in optically complex waters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the two-channel L W (λ) N algorithm based on Houskeeper et al [9] using 320 and 780 nm produced a MAD value of 41.4%, compared to 58.8% for the best performing one-channel L W (λ) N algorithm evaluated herein, which was based on L W (320) N . The two-channel L W (λ) N algorithm was applicable to global waters, i.e., algorithm log-scale residuals were approximately uniform across the global range in a CDOM (440), but the single-channel L W (λ) N algorithms were significantly degraded in higher a CDOM (440) waters, which is consistent with the findings of Hooker et al [20], in which L W (λ) N was most sensitive to increasing optical complexity within the UV and NIR domains.…”
Section: One-versus Two-band Algorithms and Wavelength Selectionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, the two-channel L W (λ) N algorithm based on Houskeeper et al [9] using 320 and 780 nm produced a MAD value of 41.4%, compared to 58.8% for the best performing one-channel L W (λ) N algorithm evaluated herein, which was based on L W (320) N . The two-channel L W (λ) N algorithm was applicable to global waters, i.e., algorithm log-scale residuals were approximately uniform across the global range in a CDOM (440), but the single-channel L W (λ) N algorithms were significantly degraded in higher a CDOM (440) waters, which is consistent with the findings of Hooker et al [20], in which L W (λ) N was most sensitive to increasing optical complexity within the UV and NIR domains.…”
Section: One-versus Two-band Algorithms and Wavelength Selectionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The opposing trends in dispersion are likely due to being more sensitive to wave focusing in clear waters and being more sensitive to broad-spectrum brightness effects (e.g., due to an elevated nonalgal particle concentration) in turbid waters. As optical complexity increases, upwelled radiant flux at the shortest wavelengths is often significantly modified, so small absolute differences in the magnitude of derived data products lead to large dispersions or variance [ 20 ]. Both Houskeeper et al [ 9 ] and Hooker et al [ 13 ] found that the correlation between and above- or in-water data products, respectively, was the most significant at the spectral end members.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because the parameters of Chl a concentration and Z SD are often used as indicators of eutrophication and turbidity in inland, coastal, and oceanic waters, many previous studies (e.g., Lewis et al, 1988;Falkowski and Wilson, 1992;Morel et al, 2007;Boyce et al, 2010Boyce et al, , 2012Doron et al, 2011) have used the empirical relationship between Z SD and Chl a concentrations to investigate phytoplankton productivity and develop algorithms for satellite ocean color remote sensing, especially in open oceans with optically simple Case I water, where phytoplankton is the primary factor affecting the IOPs of a water body (Morel and Prieur, 1977;Prieur and Sathyendranath, 1981;IOCCG, 2000). However, the variations of IOPs in optically complex coastal waters (Case II water) interacting with terrestrial waters are determined by phytoplankton, NAP, and CDOM (IOCCG, 2000;Hooker et al, 2020Hooker et al, , 2021. Although many empirical conversion factors have been reported for predicting the diffuse attenuation coefficient of the photosynthetically available radiation (PAR) (K PAR , m −1 ), which is an apparent optical property (AOP) that varies with the sun angle (Preisendorfer, 1986), there is no universal conversion factor because Z SD is affected by the bulk optical properties, especially in Case II waters (Lee et al, 2018 and references therein).…”
Section: Implications For Ecosystem Models In Optically Complex Coastal Watersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we investigated regional relationships by aggregating kelp canopy data products to the nearest 1 km coastline segments. particles (e.g., through resuspension or terrestrial inputs) challenge atmospheric correction [40] and elevate signals in the NIR domain [41]. In some instances, nearshore remote sensing challenges are anticipated to be less problematic when spatial information is also considered (e.g., the trajectory of a runoff plume), and so the FF8 annotations were retained within the nearshore zone.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%