2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2007.08.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectral radial basis functions for full sphere computations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The radial and horizontal rms velocities in both models differ from less than 0.1%. For a better numerical stability, a more stringent condition could be to impose Z, W → r l+1 as r → 0 (Bayliss et al 2007;Livermore et al 2007;Glatzmaier 2013).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The radial and horizontal rms velocities in both models differ from less than 0.1%. For a better numerical stability, a more stringent condition could be to impose Z, W → r l+1 as r → 0 (Bayliss et al 2007;Livermore et al 2007;Glatzmaier 2013).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the existing orthogonal polynomials, such as the Legendre and Chebyshev polynomials, represent the special cases of the Jacobi polynomial family that contains two free parameters (Courant & Hilbert 1953), it would be no surprise that the new geostrophic polynomial G 2k−1 (r sin q) is also connected with the Jacobi polynomial family by making a proper choice of the two free parameters together with a suitable transformation. Moreover, it should be noted that the geostrophic polynomial G 2k−1 (r sin q) is fundamentally different from the Worland polynomial W l n (r) (Livermore et al 2007), which has been used as a set of radial basis functions in full sphere computations.…”
Section: A New Legendre-type Polynomialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equations (4.2) and (4.3) are then solved numerically by expanding the velocity potentials in terms of Legendre polynomials P l (cos q) and of radial functions that satisfy the no-slip boundary condition 6) where T n (x) denotes the standard Chebyshev function, and w ln and v ln are unknown coefficients to be determined. Note that the factor r l in the expansions (4.5) and (4.6) is required to remove the numerical singularity at the origin r = 0 in a fluid sphere (see Livermore et al 2007). On substitution of equations (4.5) and (4.6) into equations (4.2) and (4.3) and application of the standard numerical procedure, we are able to derive a system of linear algebraic equations for w ln and v ln that can be found by an iterative numerical procedure.…”
Section: Numerical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A list of possible radial functions can be found in [24], and in some recent works [25,26]. In [25], how much a expansion in even or odd degree Chebyshev polynomials violates the regularity conditions at the origin is quantified, and two basis of one-sided Jacobi polynomials (Verkley and Worland) are compared.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [25], how much a expansion in even or odd degree Chebyshev polynomials violates the regularity conditions at the origin is quantified, and two basis of one-sided Jacobi polynomials (Verkley and Worland) are compared. The main conclusion is that unless there is a need of a faithful representation of the solution, preserving the regularity near the origin, Chebyshev methods would be the choice, in general, due to the availability of fast transforms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%