1959
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9394(59)91239-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectral Sensitivity in Color-Defective Subjects and Heterozygous Carriers*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

1960
1960
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, protan carriers set a lower matching luminance and deutan carriers higher than that of the normal females on the Rayleigh match. These findings confirm previous reports [6,12,13], referred to as Schmidt's [6,10,12] or De Vries' sign for protan versus deutan carriers, respectively [14,16]. There was a significant difference between protan and deutan carriers on both tests, but the large overlap between the normal females and the carriers makes it difficult to single out a carrier from her normal female peers based on the Rayleigh MMP or the Medmont C-100 null-point.…”
Section: B Reduced Sensitivity In the Medium-and Long-wavelength Regsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, protan carriers set a lower matching luminance and deutan carriers higher than that of the normal females on the Rayleigh match. These findings confirm previous reports [6,12,13], referred to as Schmidt's [6,10,12] or De Vries' sign for protan versus deutan carriers, respectively [14,16]. There was a significant difference between protan and deutan carriers on both tests, but the large overlap between the normal females and the carriers makes it difficult to single out a carrier from her normal female peers based on the Rayleigh MMP or the Medmont C-100 null-point.…”
Section: B Reduced Sensitivity In the Medium-and Long-wavelength Regsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Protan carriers are less sensitive to red light, a characteristic known as Schmidt's sign [6,[10][11][12]. Deutan carriers, on the other hand, are more sensitive to red light [12][13][14][15]. The latter is termed De Vries' sign and is said to be more difficult to demonstrate than Schmidt's sign [14,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 A few investigators have conjectured that some individuals who possess four photopigments in their retinas might have a dimension of perceptual experience that is not experienced by trichromat individuals (Deeb & Motulsky, 1996;Mollon, 1992Mollon, , 1995. 5 As discussed by Cohn, Emmerich, and Carlson (1989) heterozygous females fail to be detected by the use of an anomaloscope, although there are reported shifts in their anomaloscope color matches (Crone, 1959;Feig & Ropers, 1978;Krill & Beutler, 1964;Pickford, 1959;Schmidt, 1955), as well as shifts using flicker photometry (Crone, 1959;Ya-suma, Tokuda, & Ichikawa, 1984). However unlike normal controls, these heterozygotes exhibit failures of additivity of trichromatic color matches after exposure to a light bleaching of the rod system (Nagy et al, 1981).…”
Section: The Biological Basis Of Trichromacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Luminous efficiency functions have been used by several groups as a way of estimating the relative number of L-and M-cones in the retinal area within which it is measured (e.g., Adam, 1969;Crone, 1959;De Vries, 1946, 1948aDobkins, Thiele, & Albright, 2000;Gunther & Dobkins, 2002;Kremers, Scholl, Knau, Berendschot, & Sharpe, 2000;Lutze, Cox, Smith, & Pokorny, 1990;Rushton & Baker, 1964;Smith & Pokorny, 1975;Vimal, Pokorny, Smith, & Shevell, 1989;Vos & Walraven, 1971). The assumption underlying such estimates is that the L-cone weight a 2 (" 2 xM 2,1 /L 2,1 , in our model) directly reflects the relative numbers of the L-and M-cones contributing to luminous efficiency.…”
Section: Luminous Efficiency and Relative L-and M-cone Numerositymentioning
confidence: 99%