2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2007.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectral vegetation indices for benchmarking water productivity of irrigated cotton and sugarbeet crops

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
68
0
7

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
4
68
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The local calibration performed in [12] was also retained here, the only difference being the source of the NDVI data (satellite or hand-held radiometer). Thus there is no contradiction to state that local calibration is necessary and to find that the same method driven by satellite data is accurate: [15,16]. An empirical function between K cb and NDVI, consisting of two regressions, has been found by [9] for cotton crops.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The local calibration performed in [12] was also retained here, the only difference being the source of the NDVI data (satellite or hand-held radiometer). Thus there is no contradiction to state that local calibration is necessary and to find that the same method driven by satellite data is accurate: [15,16]. An empirical function between K cb and NDVI, consisting of two regressions, has been found by [9] for cotton crops.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is no agreement on the nature and generality of these relationships [16]. Some studies [6][7][8]11,14,17] have shown that these relationships are linear, but others have found non linearity relationships [9,10,12,16]. Therefore, establishing a unique relationship between crop coefficient and spectral vegetation indices is an ongoing research topic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general approach is consistent with Allen et al [48,55], who also proposed separating the Kc of crops that have a significant period of minimal canopy cover into dual components consisting of a basal crop coefficient (Kcb) that represents water loss by transpiration and an evaporation coefficient (Ke), representing loss from soil evaporation. Direct relationships between Fc and Kcb have been reported for several crops such as broccoli [56], wheat [57], cotton [58], sugar beets [58], and grapes [59].…”
Section: Et-based Approaches To Scheduling Irrigations In Vegetablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameter β2 corresponds to an adjustment coefficient associated with crop senescence and leaves yellowing. Both NDVI and SAVI are sensitive to leaf senescence thus yielding smaller values at the end of the growing cycle than before peak development was reached [51]. Therefore, the β2 adjustment is considered to compensate the decrease in VI due to the senescence and/or yellowing of plants, which is independent from fc.…”
Section: Basal Crop Coefficients Derived From Reflectance Vegetation mentioning
confidence: 99%