“…Within this context, eq is only valid for very weakly coupled (Hush) systems with Gaussian-shaped IVCT absorptions, such as that observed for 1 + . ,,, Thus, in the case of mixed-valent complexes with stronger interacting redox centers, H ab will be underestimated (vide supra). Hence, the investigation of the electronic coupling H ab is more accurate by using the transition dipole moment, which can be determined from the experimental spectra through integration of the IVCT absorption band. ,, However, the observation of a couple of NIR absorptions close together, as typical for metal-containing mixed-valent species, makes such a spectra analysis difficult (vide supra). ,,,,,, Furthermore, due to the complex capture of the effective charge transfer distance r ab , the geometrical distance of the interacting redox centers is often taken as a simplification, which is acceptable for weakly coupled systems. ,,,,, Considering all these assumptions, the presented H ab values (Table ) roughly verify the tendency of the increasing electronic interaction in the series of thiophenes 1 – 4 and in comparison with 2,5-diferrocenyl thiophene as well as 2,5-DiFcEDOT. As an alternative, the investigation of the solvatochromic behavior of IVCT absorptions in a series of mixed-valent compounds is also a useful tool to evaluate the magnitude of the electronic coupling, since the corresponding transitions lose solvent dependency with an increasing electronic coupling. ,,,, Thus, with reference to strongly coupled (class III) systems (Δν̃ max (IVCT) ≤ 100 cm –1 ), the electronic interaction in the considered mixed-valent thiophenes increases in the order 1 < 2,5-DiFcTh < 2,5-DiFcEDOT < 2 ≈ 3 < 4 to moderately coupled systems. ,, …”