2015
DOI: 10.5303/pkas.2015.30.2.231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectroscopic Analysis of the R Canis Majoris Binary System

Abstract: R Canis Majoris is a bright, short-period (1 d .1359) Algol-type eclipsing binary. For a long time, it was considered to be a low-mass binary star with M 1 = 1.1M and M 2 = 0.17M primary and secondary components, respectively (Tomkin, 1985). Glazunova, Yushchenko & Mkrtichian (2009) found new masses for the primary and secondary components of M 1 =1.81M and M 2 =0.23M , respectively and resolved a long-standing problem with the low masses of components for this binary. Budding and Butland (2011) confirmed the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, by adding the Hipparcos positions for the epoch 1991epoch .25 ESA (1997 to those used in Ribas et al (2002), BB2011 derive narrower constraints on the orbit of a third body in the R CMa system (see below). A-Thano et al (2015), on the other hand, presented the preliminary analysis of medium-resolution spectroscopy of R CMa obtained in 2012. They find M 1 = 1.83 M , M 2 = 0.21 M , R 1 = 1.58 R , and R 2 = 1.39 R , where the mass of the primary and the radius of the secondary are close to the values given by Glazunova et al (2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, by adding the Hipparcos positions for the epoch 1991epoch .25 ESA (1997 to those used in Ribas et al (2002), BB2011 derive narrower constraints on the orbit of a third body in the R CMa system (see below). A-Thano et al (2015), on the other hand, presented the preliminary analysis of medium-resolution spectroscopy of R CMa obtained in 2012. They find M 1 = 1.83 M , M 2 = 0.21 M , R 1 = 1.58 R , and R 2 = 1.39 R , where the mass of the primary and the radius of the secondary are close to the values given by Glazunova et al (2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%