2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2020.120305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectroscopic ellipsometry study of non-hydrogenated fully amorphous silicon films deposited by room-temperature radio-frequency magnetron sputtering on glass: Influence of the argon pressure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our computed TLUC parameters are consistent with those reported by some of the authors of this paper, in a previous work concerning with the study of a-Si semiconducting material, by the VASE technique [34]. Moreover, they are also comparable with the best-fit values of the TL-parameters, calculated from the evaporated amorphous silicon (e-a-Si) data compiled in the Palik's Handbook of Optical Properties [35], by Jellison and Modine [29].…”
Section: Data Referencesupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our computed TLUC parameters are consistent with those reported by some of the authors of this paper, in a previous work concerning with the study of a-Si semiconducting material, by the VASE technique [34]. Moreover, they are also comparable with the best-fit values of the TL-parameters, calculated from the evaporated amorphous silicon (e-a-Si) data compiled in the Palik's Handbook of Optical Properties [35], by Jellison and Modine [29].…”
Section: Data Referencesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Note that the broad peak of the imaginary part of the dielectric function, 2 , whose highest value, 2,max , is associated with the splitting of bonding and antibonding electron states, and it is located at an energy position, E( 2,max ), of nearly 3.71 eV (see Table 2), almost coincident with the calculated value of the TLUC parameter E 0 . This single smeared peak of 2 is usually shown by tetrahedrally bonded amorphous semiconductors [34], like the cases of elemental Si and Ge.…”
Section: Absorption Edge and Dielectric Function Of Rfms-a-simentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The much more preferred upper film thickness limit for most visible-to-near infrared is well below 5 µm. Even for films that are 1 µm up to well under 5 µm thick, it is best measure with multiple angles of incidence to be able to gain the necessary confidence that you have a unique film thickness solution [14]. However, with the novel approach proposed in the present work we have been able to accurately films thicker than up to 5 µm, having a notable lack of thickness uniformity, and using the normal-incidence transmission spectrum only.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Thin films of amorphous semiconductor materials have been very widely employed in all types of electronic devices, as integrated-microelectronic and optoelectronic devices, acousto-optic devices, optical fabrication of micro-lenses in chalcogenide glasses, optical phase-change materials for chalcogenide thin-film transistors and electronic memories, materials exhibiting reversible and irreversible photo-induced refractive-index changes, photovoltaic solar cells, and, very recently, in the area of chalcogenide photonics, among other important technological applications (see the following, quite ample set of illustrative references, covering all the aforementioned technological applications, [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]). Consequently, the optical characterization of such thin non-crystalline semiconducting films deposited onto thick transparent substrates, has been widely performed during the last decades [15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difference could be attributed to a change in the film structure, i.e., a possible ordered structure embedded in an amorphous matrix. In addition, at high working Ar pressures, the self-shadowing effects due to the lower mean free path due to the greater number of collisions produced in the plasma during the deposition, were more evident [ 29 ]. This would lead to the formation of more porous films, as demonstrated the lower value of the refractive index of the sample A3, of 3.17 in comparison to that calculated for samples A1 and A2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%