Spectroscopic factors derived from 16O(d, n)17F measurements

Higher order effects in theO16(d,p)O17andAssunção1, Lichtenthäler2, Guimarães3 et al. 2004Phys. Rev. C10080View full textAdd to dashboardCite

“…A spectroscopic factor of the order of S Ϸ 0.7 for the ͗ 17 F*͉ 16 O͘ overlap would be required to reproduce the data. This small value is in clear disagreement with shell model calculations and with previous measurements at higher energies ͑8-12 MeV͒ [10][11][12], which give spectroscopic factor close to 1 for this overlap. Similar calculations were performed for the neutron transfer reaction 16 O͑d , p͒ 17 O.…”

Cluster transfer reactions with the combined R-matrix and Lagrange-mesh methods

“…As discussed in Ref. [34], around 20 − 25% uncertainties are expected in the extracted SFs, due to the ambiguities of the optical potentials.…”

“…2, I plot the angular distributions of 16 O(d, n) 17 F reaction and compare them with the experimental data of Ref. [34]. Solid and dashed lines in the figure represent the calculations with and without the inclusion of the remnant term in the interaction (12).…”

“…Solid and dashed lines correspond to the calculations (using SFs = 1) with and without the inclusion of the remnant term in the potential. Experimental data are taken from Ref [34]…”

Ordering of the0d5/2and1s1/2proton levels in light nuclei

“…This state was found to have large cross sections and spectroscopic factors in proton transfer measurements, e.g., see Refs. [36][37][38], which is indicative of a single-proton state. The excitation energy of the 5/2 + state was taken from Table 17.23 of Ref.…”