1967
DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(67)90044-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectroscopic properties of porphyropsins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
47
0

Year Published

1967
1967
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
8
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The base line value was subtracted from the absorbance curve value and the difference used to compute a normalized point-curve. The Am... was estimated by the method of Dartnall, Lander & Munz (1961) as amplified by Bridges (1967) and involved 10 separate estimates based on the Al nomogram of Dartnall (Wyszecki & Stiles, 1967, p. 584).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The base line value was subtracted from the absorbance curve value and the difference used to compute a normalized point-curve. The Am... was estimated by the method of Dartnall, Lander & Munz (1961) as amplified by Bridges (1967) and involved 10 separate estimates based on the Al nomogram of Dartnall (Wyszecki & Stiles, 1967, p. 584).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A rhodopsin with an absorption maximum at about 500 nm is the likely rod photopigment for most birds (Goldsmith 1990). Therefore, the sensitivity function under reduced illumination was normalized with the maximum at 500 nm= 100%, and compared with a rhodopsin absorption function extending into the UV (Bridges 1967;Fig. 7).…”
Section: Spectral Sensitivity Under Reduced Illuminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ?. was estimated by the method of Dartnall, Lander & Munz (1961) as amplified by Bridges (1967) and involved ten separate estimates based on the A. nomogram of Dartnall (Wyszecki & Stiles, 1967, p. 584). The precision of this analytical method for rhodopsin, and the reproducibility of absorbance measurements by microspectrophotometry, have been shown previously (Bowmaker, Loew & Liebman, 1975).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%