: Correction to Vibrational Study of the Crystalline Phases of (CH 3 (OCH 2 CH 2 ) 2 OCH 3 ) 2 LiSbF 6 and P(EO) 6 LiMF 6 (M ) P, As, Sb) Page 11255. Recently we reported vibrational spectroscopic data for the crystalline compounds P(EO) 6 MF 6 (M ) As, P, Sb). 1 While this article was in proof, Prof. J.-C. Lasségues and co-workers published a similar study. 2 Prof. Lasségues kindly called my (R. Frech's) attention to the fact that our Raman data for the P(EO) 6 AsF 6 compound were consistently higher than their data by about 4-5 wavenumbers, although the data for the other two compounds were in very good agreement. In an effort to resolve this difference, we repeated the sample preparation and Raman measurements twice. Both of these sets of measurements yielded frequencies that were in agreement with Prof. Lasségues' data. Although our original measurement was repeated within two days, it is clear that a systematic calibration error had occurred and was not corrected before the second original measurement. Our original data for the P(EO) 6 AsF 6 compound and the remeasured frequencies are summarized in the accompanying table. In our original article, the differences in unit cell volumes was suggested as a possible explanation for the frequency differences between P(EO) 6 LiAsF 6 and the other two P(EO) 6 LiMF 6 compounds. This suggestion is now obviated by the concordance of frequency data for all three compounds (except for the anion modes, of course).
References and Notes(1) Frech, R.; Seneviratne, V.; Gadjourova, Z.; Bruce, P. G. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 11255. (2) Ducasse, L.; Dussauze, M.; Grondin, J.; Lassegues, J.