2016
DOI: 10.1080/22297928.2016.1265898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectroscopic Study on the Interaction of Haloperidol and 2,4-Dinitrophenylhydrazine and its Application for the Quantification in Drug Formulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the calculated t -(paired) and F -values at the 95% confidence level were less than the tabulated ones, it was concluded that no significant difference among the two methods was observed. In the interval hypothesis test, the true bias based on recovery experiments was evaluated from the following equation 49,50 where X̅ 1 and X̅ 2 are mean values determined by the proposed and reference methods, respectively. S p and t are the pooled standard deviation and one-sided t -value at the 95% confidence level, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the calculated t -(paired) and F -values at the 95% confidence level were less than the tabulated ones, it was concluded that no significant difference among the two methods was observed. In the interval hypothesis test, the true bias based on recovery experiments was evaluated from the following equation 49,50 where X̅ 1 and X̅ 2 are mean values determined by the proposed and reference methods, respectively. S p and t are the pooled standard deviation and one-sided t -value at the 95% confidence level, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the calculated t-(paired) and F-values at the 95% confidence level were less than the tabulated ones, it was concluded that no significant difference among the two methods was observed. In the interval hypothesis test, the true bias based on recovery experiments was evaluated from the following equation 49,50…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the quadratic equation shown here was applied to examine the interval hypothesis and to calculate the true bias adopting on the recoveries of experiments [34, 35]: θ2()xtrue¯12goodbreak−Sp2t2/n12θxtrue¯1xtrue¯2goodbreak+()xtrue¯22goodbreak−Sp2t2/n2goodbreak=0 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the quadratic equation shown here was applied to examine the interval hypothesis and to calculate the true bias adopting on the recoveries of experiments [34,35]:…”
Section: Analysis Of Dosage Formmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key elements of method performance (accuracy, precision, sensitivity etc.) are well established for laboratory based pharmaceutical analysis [4][5][6]. While advances continued to be made in measurement technology within existing, well established pharmaceutical techniques, the basic requirement of method validation for such techniques remains largely unchanged.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%