1973
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.7.677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectroscopy ofMn52via theFe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These values are by 371(200) keV and 364(220) keV, respectively, lower than the extrapolated ones in the latest Atomic-Mass Evaluation (AME ′ 12) [6]. The isomer excitation energy equals to E x = 387(13) keV, which is very close to E x = 378 keV of the 2 + isomer in the mirror nucleus 52 Mn [38].…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These values are by 371(200) keV and 364(220) keV, respectively, lower than the extrapolated ones in the latest Atomic-Mass Evaluation (AME ′ 12) [6]. The isomer excitation energy equals to E x = 387(13) keV, which is very close to E x = 378 keV of the 2 + isomer in the mirror nucleus 52 Mn [38].…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The absolute intensity of 42(10)% for the 2407-keV γ transition measured in 52 Co is much stronger than the 13.7(2)% 1352(10)-keV proton emission [26]. Hence, it is reasonable to assign the former as from the IAS in 52 Co with ME = −31426(10) keV, and the latter as from a 1 + state with ME = −31561(14) keV, which could be the analog 1 + state to the one identified in the mirror nucleus 52 Mn [38,39].…”
Section: Pos(inpc2016)025mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12], as well as the data analysis procedures employed. (10) [12], we have assumed for the last level an energy of 378(50) keV from the value in the mirror nucleus 52 Mn, 377.749(5) keV [10,16], fixing in this way the excitation energies for the 52 Co levels. The error of 50 keV on the 378 keV level energy, which accounts for possible mirror energy differences (MED), was estimated in Ref.…”
Section: The Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The n-p effective interaction in the deuteron [15] as well as d-n effective interaction in the triton [16] are assumed to have a Gaussian shape, while the Woods-Saxon shape [17] has been considered for the d-d effective interaction in the alpha particle. The transferred nucleon and deuteron bound states were generated in a Woods-Saxon real potential [5,6,7].…”
Section: Transfer Reactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%