Spectrum Trading with Interference Rights

Weiss, Martin B. H.; Liu, Cui

doi:10.4108/icst.crowncom.2012.248690

Cited by 5 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Different aspects of spectrum trading have been addressed in various works [12][13][14][15][16][17]. In [12], the primary owner (PO) temporarily leases its spectrum holding to unlicensed secondary users (SUs).…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Here, optimal auction mechanism called generalised Branco's mechanism has been introduced in order to maximise the expected profit of the sellers. Another spectrum trading framework has been proposed in [17] where the spectrum owner sells interference right to the SUs such that SUs could provide various types of services by restricting the interference level within the permissible limit under the contract. However, our works differ from the above works in the following aspects: We have considered BS‐level spectrum trading of different WSPs. We have modelled the spectrum trading problem as a negotiation problem for transfer of spectrum usage rights.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Reinforcement learning‐based negotiation for spectrum micro‐trading framework

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Spectrum trading has been permitted in most of the major wireless markets to facilitate better utilisation of spectrum. The authors have considered a spectrum trading framework in which a wireless service provider (WSP) leases its available channel(s) to another WSP for use at the designated base station (BS) of the latter for short duration. In their model, the agents of WSPs carry out the negotiation on the specifications of the channel usage such as transmission power, antenna height, spectrum band of the channel and price of the channel. In this work, they have modelled the negotiation as a multi-issue bilateral negotiation problem. Initially, they have solved the problem with the help of the Bayesian learning-based negotiation (BLBN) method. Furthermore, they have devised the novel reinforcement learning-based technique namely, reinforcement learning-based negotiation (RLBN) considering the adaptability of the BS to the new channel configuration. Surplus utility and convergence time of the negotiation process are considered as performance indices for the above techniques. The simulation results show that the RLBN outperforms BLBN and static negotiation technique as far as the objective of surplus utility is concerned.

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reinforcement learning‐based negotiation for spectrum micro‐trading framework

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For example, by focussing on the spectrum operating environment rather than on user protection, De Vries and Sieh propose reception rights, comprised of probabilistic reception protections and transmission permissions to define spectrum operation rights [19]. Further, Weiss and Cui propose interference rights [20]. The interference rights explicitly allow secondary users to interfere with existing services offered by a primary user to a certain level.…”

Section: Spectrum Related Rightsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dimensions of cooperative spectrum sharing: Rights and enforcement

Liu

Gomez

Weiss

2014

2014 IEEE International Symposium on Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks (DYSPAN)

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-Sharing of radio spectrum requires a careful and nuanced understanding of the rights of incumbents and spectrum entrants. In addition, the dynamics of stakeholders can be understood by examining how various rights are arranged (and rearranged) among them. Importantly, understanding the rights and their distribution is the predicate to developing rational and useful enforcement approaches.In this paper, we show that spectrum sharing involves a rearrangement of the rights associated with radio spectrum among stakeholders. We show how this rearrangement of rights implies the definition of new bundles of rights, appropriate to each particular sharing scenario. We discover these rights -and their (re)arrangement) -by examining several cases of spectrum use. We begin with the rights associated with exclusive use and proceed to consider rights arrangement in commons and different spectrum sharing configurations. Further, in the case of commons, we explicitly examine how governance of commons can affect the rights distribution in spectrum. In each case, the bundles of rights associated with each stakeholder changes.New bundles of rights have consequences, not only on the behavior of spectrum users but also on the enforcement process. Our examination of the bundles of rights shows that each rearrangement results in different approaches to enforcement. We demonstrate this by revisiting enforcement in the cases we examine.

show abstract

“…Weiser and Hatfield [10] discuss the challenges of defining these property rights, and Hazlett [11] argues that adjudication is possible despite these challenges. Weiss and Liu [12] propose an alternative to the usage rights paradigm through markets in interference rights.…”

Section: Operational Definitions For Radio Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

When is electromagnetic spectrum fungible?

Weiss

Krishnamurthy

Doyle

et al. 2012

2012 IEEE International Symposium on Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-Fungibility is a common assumption for marketbased spectrum management. In this paper, we explore the dimensions of practical fungibility of frequency bands from the point of view of the spectrum buyer who intends to use it. The exploration shows that fungibility is a complex, multidimensional concept that cannot casually be assumed. We develop two ideas for quantifying fungibility -(i) of a fungibility space in which the "distance" between two slices of spectrum provides score of fungibility and (ii) a probabilistic score of fungibility.

show abstract

Spectrum Trading with Interference Rights

Cited by 5 publications

References 9 publications

Reinforcement learning‐based negotiation for spectrum micro‐trading framework

Reinforcement learning‐based negotiation for spectrum micro‐trading framework

Dimensions of cooperative spectrum sharing: Rights and enforcement

When is electromagnetic spectrum fungible?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About