2009
DOI: 10.1063/1.3157271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specular electron scattering at single-crystal Cu(001) surfaces

Abstract: Epitaxial copper layers, 20 nm to 1.5-m-thick, were grown on MgO͑001͒ by ultrahigh vacuum magnetron sputter deposition at 80°C. In situ electrical resistivity measurements indicate partial specular scattering at the Cu vacuum interface with a Fuchs-Sondheimer scattering parameter p = 0.6Ϯ 0.1. In situ deposition of 0.3 to 7.0-nm-thick Ta cap layers on the Cu surfaces leads to a resistivity increase, which is independent of the Ta thickness and is associated with a transition to completely diffuse surface scatt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
65
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
7
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2͒. These results qualitatively agree with experimental observations where the Cu sheet resistance was reported to increase by up to 15% using Ta barrier coating; 9 and was always reduced with Al barrier coating. 1 A comparison between the two coating models ͑one-layer or four-layer barrier͒ does not show a significant qualitative difference, suggesting that the most important contribution to resistivity comes from the Cu-barrier metal interface.…”
Section: Theoretical Methodssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2͒. These results qualitatively agree with experimental observations where the Cu sheet resistance was reported to increase by up to 15% using Ta barrier coating; 9 and was always reduced with Al barrier coating. 1 A comparison between the two coating models ͑one-layer or four-layer barrier͒ does not show a significant qualitative difference, suggesting that the most important contribution to resistivity comes from the Cu-barrier metal interface.…”
Section: Theoretical Methodssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This trend is consistent with experimental observations. 1,9 The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In the next section, we present the theoretical method used in our calculations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, diffuse scattering (p = 0) results in a complete randomization of the electron momentum and a corresponding increase in the resistivity. Surface scattering processes and, in turn, values for p, are affected by charge density variations associated with atomic level surface roughness [8][9][10][11] and the interface with other atoms and molecules, [12][13][14][15][16] which are typically different for the top and bottom surfaces. We reported earlier, 10 using a derivation comparable to FS, the expression for the resistivity ρ s of a single-crystal metal layer of thickness d with top and bottom surfaces with different specularity parameters p 1 and p 2 : and R (0 < R < 1) is the reflection coefficient of electrons scattering at the grain boundaries perpendicular to the current flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technical importance of this problem is reflected in the fact that it has given rise to several papers focused on this issue published over the last two years. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] However, after over a century of research, it would appear that the understanding of size effects in thin metallic films today still seems fragmentary and incomplete. Results published recently 9,10 constitute a strong evidence that supports a suggestion published over 25 years ago, 11 and confirms that the contribution to the resistivity of a thin metallic film arising from electron scattering by structural defects other than rough surfaces (such as electron-grain boundary scattering) may be significant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%