1942
DOI: 10.1037/h0060838
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speech and personality.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

1951
1951
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following study analyzes the natural language of competitive negotiations to explore the three primary components of engagement in interpersonal conversations: Emotional engagement (references to positive and negative emotions), social engagement (references to one's conversation partner), and task engagement (references to the negotiation issues and options). In agreement with Donohue () and a number of researchers outside of the negotiation literature (e.g., Danescu‐Niculescu‐Mizil, Lee, Pang, & Kleinberg, in press; Fiedler, ; Michel et al., ; Pennebaker, Mehl, & Niederhoffer, ; Sanford, ; Weintraub, ), we argue that language is a psychometrically valid data source in itself, independent of questionnaire data or observer reports. Although each of those data sources is critical in the behavioral and social sciences, records of behavior throughout an interaction have primacy over self‐reports insofar as they are real‐time and not retrospective measures (Donohue, ).…”
Section: Language Style Matchingsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The following study analyzes the natural language of competitive negotiations to explore the three primary components of engagement in interpersonal conversations: Emotional engagement (references to positive and negative emotions), social engagement (references to one's conversation partner), and task engagement (references to the negotiation issues and options). In agreement with Donohue () and a number of researchers outside of the negotiation literature (e.g., Danescu‐Niculescu‐Mizil, Lee, Pang, & Kleinberg, in press; Fiedler, ; Michel et al., ; Pennebaker, Mehl, & Niederhoffer, ; Sanford, ; Weintraub, ), we argue that language is a psychometrically valid data source in itself, independent of questionnaire data or observer reports. Although each of those data sources is critical in the behavioral and social sciences, records of behavior throughout an interaction have primacy over self‐reports insofar as they are real‐time and not retrospective measures (Donohue, ).…”
Section: Language Style Matchingsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…All else being equal, the greater the ratio of abstract to total nouns, the greater the degree of creativeness in a passage. Indicators of abstraction such as the ratio of abstract to total nouns have been proposed by Carroll (1960), Sanford (1942) and Flesch (1950) and counts on abstract nouns and abstract verbs have been shown to be sensitive discriminators between oral and written communication (Devito, 1965(Devito, ,1967Gillie, 1957).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sanford (1942) states that 'there is an intimate relation between the speech of an individual and his broader social adjustments'. Many researchers (Jones, 1965) have suggested that differences attributed to bilingualism may, in fact, be in part attributable to sociological differences.…”
Section: S M Durojaiye Makerere University Ugandamentioning
confidence: 99%