Speech-evoked brainstem response in normal adolescent and children speakers of Brazilian Portuguese

Sanfins, Milaine Dominici; Borges, Letícia Reis; Ubiali, Thalita; Donadon, Caroline; Hein, Thaís Antonelli Diniz; Hatzopoulos, Stavros; Colella-Santos, Maria Francisca

doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.08.024

Cited by 15 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, previous studies show that there is difference response in subjects from different culture [22] since each language has its own characteristics and peculiarities that can contribute or not to a suitable processing of speech sounds.…”

Section: Parametersmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…However, additional studies have been initiated in numerous languages such as Arabic, Brazilian Portuguese, French, Greek, Hebrew, Indian, Japanese, and Persian [1,11,13,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32].…”

Section: Parametersmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The electrode on the left ear can be connected to input 2/channel 1, and the electrode on the right ear can be connected to ground connection cable. During the recording session, impedance should be maintained at below 5 kΩ and interelectrode impedance below 3 kΩ [22].…”

Section: Electrode Montagementioning

confidence: 99%

“…The syllable / da/ is most well known and applied more often in studies [11,13,15,22,25,28,29,32,36,39,45,47]. However, there are researchers who used disyllables as /baba/ [27] or even other syllables composed by consonant-vowel as /ba/ [23,30,31].…”

Section: Stimulusmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Approximately, 90.5% of the previous studies have used alternating polarity [13,22,23,28,29,39,45,47,49,50]. The choice for this type of polarity should be the reduction of artifacts and cochlear microphonic [51].…”

Section: Stimulusmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Speech-Evoked Brainstem Response

Sanfins¹,

Skarżyński²,

FranciscaColella-Santos³

2017

Advances in Clinical Audiology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The auditory brainstem response (ABR) is a clinical tool to assess the neural functionality of the auditory brainstem. The use of verbal stimuli in ABR protocols has provided important information of how the speech stimuli are processed by the brainstem structure. The perception of speech sounds seems to begin in the brainstem, which has an important role in the reading process and the phonological acquisition speech ABR assessment allows the identification of fine-grained auditory processing deficits, which do not appear in click evoked ABR responses. The syllable /da/ is commonly used by speech ABR assessment due to it being considered a universal syllable and allows it to be applied in different countries with good clinical assertiveness. The speech ABR is a objective, fast procedure that can be applied to very young subjects. It be utilized in different languages and can provide differential diagnoses of diseases with similar symptoms, as an effective biomarker of auditory processing disorders present in various diseases, such as dyslexia, specific language impairment, hearing loss, auditory processing disorders, otitis media, and scholastic difficulties. Speech ABR protocols can assist in the detection, treatment, and monitoring of various types of hearing impairments.

show abstract

Section: Parametersmentioning

confidence: 98%

Section: Parametersmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Electrode Montagementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Stimulusmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Stimulusmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Speech-Evoked Brainstem Response

Sanfins¹,

Skarżyński²,

FranciscaColella-Santos³

2017

Advances in Clinical Audiology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Speech auditory brainstem response in audiological practice: a systematic review

Başöz

Guler

Kuru

et al. 2023

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Frequency-Following Response with Speech Stimulus: Comparison between Two Methods of Stimulation

Sanguebuche

Silva

Peixe

et al. 2019

Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction Frequency-following response with speech stimulus (FFR-speech) is a subcortical potential that satisfactorily evaluates the processing of verbal information. However, there still are differences in the literature regarding its analysis and stimulation protocol. Objective To compare two stimulation protocols for the capture of FFR-speech, to identify the percentage of occurrence of the waves among them and to compare it with the specialized literature, as well as to describe the interpeaks of its waves. Method Considering the eligibility criteria, the sample consisted of 30 normal-hearing adults, with no complaints of speech comprehension. All of them were submitted to a basic audiological evaluation, to brainstem auditory evoked potential with click stimulus, and to FFR-speech. In the latter, 2 types of stimulation were performed, 3 series of 1,000 sweeps, and 2 series of 3,000 sweeps, for subsequent analysis of the resulting wave, in which we tried to mark the peak V followed by valleys A, C, D, E, F, and O. Results Differences in latency and interpeaks were not found between the protocols. In general, a higher occurrence of waves in the stimulation of 2 series of 3,000 sweeps was observed, but only the A valley presented a significant difference. When the values of the waves were compared with the literature, the V and A waves showed fewer occurrences in the present study. Conclusion The protocol of 2 series of 3,000 sweeps was better for FFR-speech in the studied equipment, considering the higher occurrence of waves, even though it is inferior to the specialized literature. Furthermore, it was possible to describe interpeak values and to observe no difference between the studied protocols

show abstract

Speech-evoked brainstem response in normal adolescent and children speakers of Brazilian Portuguese

Cited by 15 publications

References 34 publications

Speech-Evoked Brainstem Response

Speech-Evoked Brainstem Response

Speech auditory brainstem response in audiological practice: a systematic review

Frequency-Following Response with Speech Stimulus: Comparison between Two Methods of Stimulation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About