2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.specom.2009.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speech face perception is locked to anticipation in speech production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Lip area values, as calculated on the still image of the lips at vowel midpoint, were 1.4 and 1.3 cm 2 , respectively, for both vowels of /izi/, and lip area values were 1.2 and 0.4 cm 2 , respectively, for both vowels of /izy/. Those geometrical values are in line with those reported for French speakers [9,14]. The fricative consonant /z/ was chosen because it is phonologically a nonlabial consonant, thus allowing the anticipatory rounded gesture associated with the phonologically labial /y/ vowel to be produced through this consonant.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lip area values, as calculated on the still image of the lips at vowel midpoint, were 1.4 and 1.3 cm 2 , respectively, for both vowels of /izi/, and lip area values were 1.2 and 0.4 cm 2 , respectively, for both vowels of /izy/. Those geometrical values are in line with those reported for French speakers [9,14]. The fricative consonant /z/ was chosen because it is phonologically a nonlabial consonant, thus allowing the anticipatory rounded gesture associated with the phonologically labial /y/ vowel to be produced through this consonant.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…When presented with truncated stimuli (gating paradigm) in the visual-only condition, participants can identify the rounded vowel when the lip area decreased to approximately 1 cm 2 , before the change in formant structure associated with lip rounding [8,9]. Thus, the varying shapes of the speaker's lips provide the listener with anticipatory cues that are functional in the speech perception process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the next question is to know if the auditory and visual systems are able to process the information efficiently as soon as it is available. This is actually not always the case, and in gating experiments on the visual vs. auditory identification of coarticulated sequences, Troille et al [37] display in some configurations a lead of audition on vision which can reach up to 40 ms, because of the poor visibility of some articulatory gestures. This leads the authors to claim that they have discovered a case where “speech can be heard before it is seen”.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, there are actually a variety of situations from audio lead (estimated to 40 ms in [37]) to visual lead (which can reach more than 200 ms). In their study of mutual information between audio and video parameters on speech sequences, Feldhoffer et al [38] show that mutual information is maximal for some audio and video parameters when it incorporates a video lead up to 100 ms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, certain specific aspects of our data may not generalize to other speech sounds, tokens, speakers, etc. These factors have been shown to influence the outcome of, e.g., gating studies (Troille, Cathiard, & Abry, 2010). However, the main findings of the current study seem likely to hold across additional contexts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%