2016
DOI: 10.3758/s13414-016-1087-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speech imagery recalibrates speech-perception boundaries

Abstract: The perceptual boundaries between speech sounds are malleable and can shift after repeated exposure to contextual information. This shift is known as recalibration. To date, the known inducers of recalibration are lexical (including phonotactic) information, lip-read information and reading. The experiments reported here are a proof-of-effect demonstration that speech imagery can also induce recalibration.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas phonetic recalibration may result from various natural or acquired stimulus mappings, different types of mappings may differ in the strength of the resulting recalibration effects. For example, recalibration effects are typically reported to be stronger for lipread speech, as compared to lexical speech information 33 , mouthing or speech imagery 24 . Similarly, lipread speech has a stronger effect than visual text 25 , 34 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whereas phonetic recalibration may result from various natural or acquired stimulus mappings, different types of mappings may differ in the strength of the resulting recalibration effects. For example, recalibration effects are typically reported to be stronger for lipread speech, as compared to lexical speech information 33 , mouthing or speech imagery 24 . Similarly, lipread speech has a stronger effect than visual text 25 , 34 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, most recalibration studies have exploited the naturally evolved audiovisual association between spoken language and lip movements 21 , 22 . Other stimuli that have been shown to recalibrate listener’s perceptual speech boundaries include lexical (spoken word) context 23 , and more recently, overt or imagined speech articulation 24 , and written text 25 . During text-based recalibration, repeated pairing of the ambiguous /a?a/ sound to the text ‘aba’ (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…/a?a/ mapped onto /aba/). A number of visual stimuli have been shown to elicit recalibration including lip-read speech ( Bertelson et al, 2003 , Ullas et al, 2020a , Vroomen and Baart, 2012 ), spoken word context ( Norris et al, 2003 , Ullas et al, 2020a ), overt speech articulation ( Scott, 2016 ), and most recently, text ( Bonte et al, 2017 , Keetels et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A complementary approach to investigate letter-speech sound coupling can be found in (phonetic) recalibration paradigms, in which the perceived identity of an ambiguous speech sound is biased in the direction of previously presented disambiguating context information. This context information can consist of lip-read speech (Bertelson et al, 2003; Vroomen and Baart, 2012), lexical (spoken word) context (Norris et al, 2003), overt or imagined speech articulation (Scott, 2016), or, most relevant for our current study, visual text (Bonte et al, 2017; Keetels et al, 2018). In the classical recalibration paradigm an ambiguous speech sound /a?a/ midway between /aba/ and /ada/ is combined with a disambiguating video of a speaker articulating ‘aba’ or ‘ada’ to bias the perception of the ambiguous sound toward the video.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%