2014
DOI: 10.1121/1.4877738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speech intelligibility across native and non-native accents: Accent similarity and electrophysiological measures of word recognition

Abstract: The intelligibility of accented speech in noise greatly depends on the pairing of speaker and listener, where two important factors are a listener’s familiarity with a speaker’s accent and the acoustic similarity between their accents. In this study, we present patterns of the intelligibility of standard British English, Glaswegian English and Spanish English accents for British and high and low proficiency Spanish listeners. We predict intelligibility will correlate with acoustic-phonetic similarity across ac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A likely reason why foreign accent experience did not improve performance in our study is that the foreign accents children were familiar with and the unfamiliar accent in the experiment were more dissimilar than the regional accents (Pinet et al, 2011;Stringer 2015). Stringer argues that similarity between the accent of a talker and the accent of a listener could be a better predictor of accent intelligibility than familiarity or experience with accented speech.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…A likely reason why foreign accent experience did not improve performance in our study is that the foreign accents children were familiar with and the unfamiliar accent in the experiment were more dissimilar than the regional accents (Pinet et al, 2011;Stringer 2015). Stringer argues that similarity between the accent of a talker and the accent of a listener could be a better predictor of accent intelligibility than familiarity or experience with accented speech.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%