2017
DOI: 10.1044/2016_ajslp-14-0181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speech-Language Pathologists' Use of Hearing Screening for Clients With Aphasia: Challenges, Potential Solutions, and Future Directions

Abstract: SLPs are an important resource for identifying potential hearing loss in individuals with aphasia. These data suggest that hearing screenings are being conducted only inconsistently with this population, often using nonstandardized methods. The results demonstrate a need to develop hearing-screening tools that are affordable, easily accessible, and validated for aphasia, and to raise awareness of currently available hearing-screening protocols and tools.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, after exiting the clinic, PWA may engage in communication on a busy street, in a crowded store, or at a family reunion, and in these environments, their ability to process the speech of a conversational partner may decline in ways that their standardized testing results might not predict. Fortunately, there is an increasing awareness of the importance of audiological assessment in PWA (Silkes & Winterstein, 2017;Zhang et al, 2018), although standard audiometric evaluations do not include speech masking conditions (Jakien, Kampel, Stansell, & Gallun, 2017). We hope that the results of this study will further encourage clinicians to consider the degree to which the presence-and type-of background noise might impact speech processing in PWA.…”
Section: Implications and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, after exiting the clinic, PWA may engage in communication on a busy street, in a crowded store, or at a family reunion, and in these environments, their ability to process the speech of a conversational partner may decline in ways that their standardized testing results might not predict. Fortunately, there is an increasing awareness of the importance of audiological assessment in PWA (Silkes & Winterstein, 2017;Zhang et al, 2018), although standard audiometric evaluations do not include speech masking conditions (Jakien, Kampel, Stansell, & Gallun, 2017). We hope that the results of this study will further encourage clinicians to consider the degree to which the presence-and type-of background noise might impact speech processing in PWA.…”
Section: Implications and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…These findings regarding age and HL are pertinent when considering how PWA may perform on similar listening tasks. Not only is stroke more common in older individuals, but aphasia is more likely to occur in older than in younger stroke patients (Ellis & Urban, 2016;Engelter et al, 2006); furthermore, many PWA demonstrate some degree of HL (Formby, Phillips, & Thomas, 1987;Silkes & Winterstein, 2017;Zhang et al, 2018). In addition to the effects of age and HL, there is evidence that PWA may experience further breakdowns in processing target speech due to their acquired cognitive-linguistic impairments (Rankin, Newton, Parker, & Bruce, 2014;Winchester & Hartman, 1955).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%