2010
DOI: 10.1515/9783110219111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speech, Memory, and Meaning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Gasparov (2010) underscores that intertextuality is just as important and widespread in everyday conversation as it is in literary analysis. Gasparov (2010) aims to show how all new utterances are built upon the foundation of our previous speaking experiences. Intertextuality can act as a powerful tool to improve memory and learning.…”
Section: Intertextuality and Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gasparov (2010) underscores that intertextuality is just as important and widespread in everyday conversation as it is in literary analysis. Gasparov (2010) aims to show how all new utterances are built upon the foundation of our previous speaking experiences. Intertextuality can act as a powerful tool to improve memory and learning.…”
Section: Intertextuality and Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It makes the task clearer since it supports the idea presented by a text. However, it can be dysfunctional or lead the students to misunderstand the task if the techniques are not consistent with the students' cultural background (Gasparov, 2010 ;Nevins, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intertextuality used in the classroom isa linguistic activity to build the students' new language (Gasparov, 2010). It involves what the students knew before as background knowledge or experience.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Memory has traditionally been one of the central concepts in philosophy and psychology, but recent decades have seen its persistent penetration into other research fields (see Assmann, 2008;Erll, 2011;Halbwachs, 1997;Hirsch, 2008;Klein, 2000), linguistics being no exception (see Bragina, 2007;Chafe, 1973;Gasparov, 2010;Smorti, Peterson & Tani, 2016;Wierzbicka, 2007). Theories and models describing memorylanguage relationships vary significantly across fields and authors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%