2001 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37221)
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2001.940874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speech recognition for DARPA Communicator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, we next interpolated the state-independent class trigram with a state-dependent class trigram. As in [3], we found that estimating weights chosen to optimize the language model perplexity of a development corpus was worse than simply using i in all the states, perhaps due to insufficient development data. Table 2 shows that the word error rate, averaged over states 2 through 4, was reduced from 21.1% to 20.6%, a relative reduction of 2.4% (adapted 3-gram).…”
Section: ¢ -Gramsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…In contrast, we next interpolated the state-independent class trigram with a state-dependent class trigram. As in [3], we found that estimating weights chosen to optimize the language model perplexity of a development corpus was worse than simply using i in all the states, perhaps due to insufficient development data. Table 2 shows that the word error rate, averaged over states 2 through 4, was reduced from 21.1% to 20.6%, a relative reduction of 2.4% (adapted 3-gram).…”
Section: ¢ -Gramsmentioning
confidence: 58%