2017
DOI: 10.1080/02699206.2017.1402090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speech recovery and language plasticity can be facilitated by Sensori-Motor Fusion training in chronic non-fluent aphasia. A case report study

Abstract: The rehabilitation of speech disorders benefits from providing visual information which may improve speech motor plans in patients. We tested the proof of concept of a rehabilitation method (Sensori-Motor Fusion, SMF; Ultraspeech player) in one post-stroke patient presenting chronic non-fluent aphasia. SMF allows visualisation by the patient of target tongue and lips movements using high-speed ultrasound and video imaging. This can improve the patient's awareness of his/her own lingual and labial movements, wh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Activation was found in the left peri-lesional cortex (Fridriksson et al, 2010b;Mattioli et al, 2014;van Hees et al, 2014a;Zhu et al, 2014), in bilateral regions (Pulvermüller et al, 2005;Fridriksson et al, 2006;Brownsett et al, 2014), and during rs-fMRI (van Hees et al, 2014b). Finally, Haldin et al (2018) used a sensori-motor rehabilitation method in one patient and obtained language improvement associated with increased activity in brain areas outside the language network (i.e., somatosensory areas). Once again, this highlights the complexity of the language process.…”
Section: Chronic Phasementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Activation was found in the left peri-lesional cortex (Fridriksson et al, 2010b;Mattioli et al, 2014;van Hees et al, 2014a;Zhu et al, 2014), in bilateral regions (Pulvermüller et al, 2005;Fridriksson et al, 2006;Brownsett et al, 2014), and during rs-fMRI (van Hees et al, 2014b). Finally, Haldin et al (2018) used a sensori-motor rehabilitation method in one patient and obtained language improvement associated with increased activity in brain areas outside the language network (i.e., somatosensory areas). Once again, this highlights the complexity of the language process.…”
Section: Chronic Phasementioning
confidence: 95%
“…The InLang database contains data of 13 different linguistic tasks from 7 previously published fMRI protocols (Baciu et al, 2016; Banjac et al, 2020; Grandchamp et al, 2019; Haldin et al, 2018; Hoyau, 2018; Perrone-Bertolotti et al, 2011, 2015, 2017; Perrone-Bertolotti et al, 2012), as well as respective structural MRIs (T1w). In all, 359 functional scans have been acquired between 2010 and 2019 from 150 healthy adults (all right-handed; 64 females: F/86 males: M; Table S1 contains the subjects’ characteristics, by tasks).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, across studies, the statistical threshold applied to these contrasts of interest varied. This threshold was sometimes not reported (Marcotte & Ansaldo, 2010;Vitali et al, 2007), and frequently, it was not corrected for multiple comparisons (Abel et al, 2014(Abel et al, , 2015Haldin et al, 2018;Kiran et al, 2015;Marcotte et al, 2013Marcotte et al, , 2018Menke et al, 2009;Thompson, Riley, den Ouden, Meltzer-Asscher, & Lukic, 2013;Vitali et al, 2010;Wan et al, 2014). This again complicates the comparison of response foci across studies.…”
Section: Variability Across Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%