Acoustical Signal Processing in the Central Auditory System 1997
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-8712-9_38
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speech Representation in the Auditory Nerve and Ventral Cochlear Nucleus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason, of course, is that the fibres are mostly responding to F1, which does not change between these two stimuli. May et al (1996) obtained a similar result for discrimination of the F2 frequency using a different method in which a model was fitted to the rate responses to vowels and d 0 was computed from the model. The model is based on data like those to be discussed later in figure 9.…”
Section: Inferences From Discrimination Datamentioning
confidence: 72%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The reason, of course, is that the fibres are mostly responding to F1, which does not change between these two stimuli. May et al (1996) obtained a similar result for discrimination of the F2 frequency using a different method in which a model was fitted to the rate responses to vowels and d 0 was computed from the model. The model is based on data like those to be discussed later in figure 9.…”
Section: Inferences From Discrimination Datamentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The model is based on data like those to be discussed later in figure 9. They also measured the behavioural jnd for F2 frequency in cats May et al 1996), and showed that the jnd predicted for one optimally chosen AN fibre is very close to the behavioural jnd. 'Optimally chosen' means a fibre with a BF at the peak of the rate difference plot.…”
Section: Inferences From Discrimination Datamentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, their intrinsic membrane properties (Oertel et al, 1988) combined with the distribution of inputs on their soma and dendrites (Cant, 1981) seem to sensitize them to the firing rate of auditory nerve fibers (Young et al, 1988). Some chopper units respond over wide ranges of intensity (Rhode and Smith, 1986) even in the presence of intense background noise (May and Sachs, 1992;May et al, 1997). It seems relevant to note that birds use IIDs to detect the elevation of a sound in space and that the neural pathways subserving IID detection are composed primarily of chopper units (Sullivan and Konishi, 1984;Takahashi et al, 1984;Mogdans and Knudsen, 1994).…”
Section: Functional Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%