Intelligent Speech Signal Processing 2019
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-818130-0.00007-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speech Summarization for Tamil Language

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MFCC based comparative study of speech recognition techniques was conducted by authors who found that MFCC with HMM gave recognition accuracy of 85 percent and with deep neural networks the score was 82.2 percent [56]. Computation of MFCCs includes a conversion of the Fourier coefficients to Mel-scale [57]. Mel-scale are the most popular variant used today, even if there is no theoretical reason that the Mel-scale is superior to the other scales [58].…”
Section: C1 Mfccmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MFCC based comparative study of speech recognition techniques was conducted by authors who found that MFCC with HMM gave recognition accuracy of 85 percent and with deep neural networks the score was 82.2 percent [56]. Computation of MFCCs includes a conversion of the Fourier coefficients to Mel-scale [57]. Mel-scale are the most popular variant used today, even if there is no theoretical reason that the Mel-scale is superior to the other scales [58].…”
Section: C1 Mfccmentioning
confidence: 99%