Highlights
Considering the quantitative findings, the telepractice and in-person groups showed a performance on an equivalent level.
The greatest majority of the participants reported that they had adapted to telepractice and that this method was appropriate for them, despite barriers.
For the clinician, loss of time, cost, and effort occurred more than expected for telepractice service.
Some qualifications, such as experience, psychological factors, and lifestyle, have emerged as suitable candidate criteria for telepractice and the success of treatment.
This delivery method can be a great alternative when in-person services cannot be carried out in circumstances such as rural life or global disasters like COVID-19 Pandemic.